User talk:Isabelleadeyinka/Women in government

Currently, the article touches on the state of female politicians in 25 “case study” countries. There is a section summarizing the unique challenges female politicians face, such as barriers preventing them from running/winning public office and systemic issues for elected officials. The article is clear and well-written, and organized into very clear sections. One of the article’s strongest sections is “Challenges faced by women.” The table of women’s representation in parliaments around the world is also very helpful at the beginning. The article is covering a very broad topic; some, but not all, of the infinite possible subcategories are addressed. In terms of the individual country case studies, there is not a set organization for the material presented under each country. The sections sometimes address different things (thus the reader can’t compare two countries on a specific metric), some focus really heavily on individual politicians, while others focus on the number of women in government, etc. It could streamline the article if the reader knew what to expect for each section, and they didn’t feel so wildly different/disjointed. Overall, the article is on its way to completion. It is already of a considerable length, but there are a couple of sections that could be expanded and substantiated with more details: suffrage and pathways to political involvement.Juliaschilz (talk) 02:44, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Peer Review
Overall, this author hasn’t added much to the article yet, but it’s heading in the right direction. I think that the example of Kamala Harris should be mentioned in this section of the article and not only be explained in the image. Additionally, there are grammatical errors with the added section that need to be edited- the punctuation around ‘however’ is incorrect. I think the source added was very applicable and added to the article, especially with it being a scholarly source. There is a lot of potential to expand around this section. Kef1170 (talk) 23:44, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Peer review
The article overall seems to be in the right direction. It has a very good lead sections which gives the major points and the sections of the article. The sections are very thorough and include statistics, research, and pictures to help the reader better understand the topic. The articles strength is the details provided and the section on pathways to political involvement. It showcases the different ways and barriers women must face to acquire political power. The article can be improved by updating its sources and data. The numbers on number of women in government are from 2019 the amount per country for the top 20 most represented is from 2014. While they updated information on the current heads of state or government it includes women from 2021, its section on specific countries is outdated. For instance, it includes data (a graph) for the number of women in congress for the United States is from 1977 to 2006. Although it includes some data from 2021 it should update the majority of its data. The article is developing and it could benefit from some improvements. An increase in the sections on specific countries would help provide more insight into the issue. Additionally, adding some information to its historic first as head of state or government such as their pathway to political power and their polices would help show how these women were able to become the firsts. DanOWL678 (talk) 04:58, 9 December 2021 (UTC)