User talk:Isabellewoods/sandbox

Article evaluation
My article has to do with behavioral neuroscience. This article has a decently neutral tone as it is mostly stating sciatic facts and definitions. It goes over debated over the connection of Monday and body while showing debates from many sides. This article also goes through reproach methods and history as neuroscience has evolved and more is learned.

When I went to the references I clicked on many of the links and all of them working helping the websites case in being reliable. They also have also links to which relate to this article which I think helps provide the reader with easy access to learn more.

Evaluating my article
As I said in the excessive from last week this article seems to be very neutral as is just trying to explain biological neuroscience, how it was found, its research methods and topics related to the subject. Each claim does not have a citation yet most, if not nearly all, have a citation. The citation that were there seemed to be reliable as the links they contained went to new websites on that topic. If I were to add anything to this article I think I might not add more scientific ideas but social things. The article goes over more of what it is and why it is rather than how it may affect people on a day to day basis and how I daily lives are affected by this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Isabellewoods (talk • contribs) 19:11, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Sources that may add to this article.
The Neuroscience of everyday life, Neuroscience in everyday life from psychology today, and theories of biological psychology from Verywell mind all add to this article while putting the subject in different view points. User:Isabellewoods —Preceding undated comment added 19:30, 24 April 2019 (UTC)