User talk:Isad15

Sferguson peer review
The article’s overall status is far from complete. There are a slew of structural additions and details part of this rubric that could be applied to make the article more ready for publication on Wikipedia.

The article’s style of organization is well done. The scaffolding is there for this to appear like an official page for the NWTF. The two subsections about the organization are well-written and provide critical information.

The article could stand to benefit from more facts, more fact citation, a more diverse range of sources, the addition of images and robust captions that compliment the article, and polishing up (the header states “Article Draft.”) Most importantly all facts should be cited from where they were researched. Furthermore, there needs to be more substance. The fact about the NWTF trying to raise representation to 35% is repeated in the article, and considering how short this draft is, there should not already be repetition.

The article is poorly developed. It is a very short draft that needs a lot of changes to be ready soon. The NWTF is a good topic and is worth writing about in detail, but those details need to be supplied and integrated into the framework that already looks good. Sferguson11 (talk) 21:36, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Isad15, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:08, 24 April 2023 (UTC)