User talk:Isak2017

Welcome!
Hello, Isak2017, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Dr. Isak Rajjak Shaikh, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Winged Blades Godric 10:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Dr. Isak Rajjak Shaikh


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Dr. Isak Rajjak Shaikh, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Winged Blades Godric 10:48, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:19, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dr. Isak Rajjak Shaikh


The article Dr. Isak Rajjak Shaikh has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Appears to not meet Notability (people) looks more like promotion/CV

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KylieTastic (talk) 21:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Isak Rajjak Shaikh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Isak Rajjak Shaikh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Isak Rajjak Shaikh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Winged Blades Godric 08:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but it appears you have written or added to an article about yourself, at Isak Rajjak Shaikh. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 14:01, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Isak Rajjak Shaikh
If you are serious about not wanting the article deleted, you need to stop blindly reverting other people's improvements to the article. This edit removed necessary maintenance templates and restored template errors as well as a large number of inappropriate links. Why do you keep adding Wikipedia articles to the "External links" section, for instance? Wikipedia links are not external links, they are internal links. And the references/links sections are once again a jumbled mess.

Also note that if the article is kept, it has to be severely pruned. All text about alleged injustice, as well as the details about how Shaikh felt when he was in Taiwan, etc, has to be removed. Such details do not belong in any Wikipedia article, and after all you claim (repeatedly) that you want the article to follow Wikipedia policy. At the moment, I am not at all interested in trying to help improve the article (given that you have attacked me and other editors, calling our good-faith edits "malicious" and the acts of "crooks") but if you want to edit Wikipedia you have to work collaboratively and accept that every good-faith editor has the same right to improve the encyclopedia by making articles conform to our standards.

That being said, there is nothing in the article or the references that indicates that Shaikh meets Wikipedia's peculiar criteria for notability, and for that reason alone, if for no other reason, it will almost certainly be deleted. If you keep adding inappropriate content, that's another reason to delete it, unfortunately.

Finally, please stick to one single account to edit Wikipedia, participate in discussions, etc. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 18:54, 12 March 2017 (UTC)