User talk:Isbenn/Dark triad

Content
Overall a great start to the topic, It looks like you guys have just started laying a foundation down for what your topics are going to be about within future paragraphs. Also make sure you guys are using the heading option that way I know what the paragraphs below are going to be talking about. I do not really know why your resources are in the middle of your content and at the bottom just make sure that all your references are at the bottom only. This is a very interesting topic to talk about and I can not wait to see what the end product will be.LoganFuchs (talk) 13:11, 24 March 2023 (UTC) LoganFuchs (talk) 13:04, 24 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for the feedback. We had worked on adding to two separate sections of the article and that is why the references were separated between the two sections. We have moved all of the references to the bottom of the sandbox and added headings to separate the two paragraphs. HowAboutThisName (talk) 03:15, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Peer Review
Having three citations already is fantastic. The first and third citation look like very good sources. I would look into if the second citation is done correctly, I was unable to find the article you were referencing. I noticed a minor typo in the first sentence "mad" instead of "made". There is another minor typo in the third addition, "Machiavelliansim" instead of "Machiavellianism". Overall all three additions are very well written and add valuable information to the article. When I read the article the thing I thought could use the most work still would be comparing the similarities of the three components of the Dark triad and more work distinguishing the differences between each of the three components and what psychiatrists look for to tell the difference between each of the three. The measurement of the dirty dozen paragraph looks fantastic, and adds a lot to the article. The only suggestion I have to improve it would be to break the last sentence up into two sentences. Overall these look like some great improvements so far! Ianh7 (talk) 16:39, 24 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you for reviewing our article. We implemented was the grammar and spelling mistakes that were in the draft so it looks more professional. We didn’t change the second link because when we checked again it still lead to the correct article for us. HowAboutThisName (talk) 03:25, 10 April 2023 (UTC)