User talk:Iseult/2016/April

The Signpost: 1 April 2016
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors April 2016 Newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Dschslava. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A enabled] rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Widr (talk) 06:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Please advise
Hello Dschslava, For some reason our articles Haulmont and CUBA Platform are marked for deletion though we previously made all disclosures and they were approved for adding to Wiki. Now appears someone "Patar knight" and and puts deletion tag on both articles. He says that Haulmont mentioning is not valuable for Wiki (despite the arguments on talk page) and for CUBA Platform he doesn't state any arguments for deletion at all. Can you advise please what should we do to negotiate it? You seem to be more friendly, so your advise will be appreciated. Thank you in advance, Andrey. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndreyLednev (talk • contribs) 09:22, 10 April 2016 (UTC)
 * his arguments are based on WP:GNG. I recommend that you find extensive coverage in reliable secondary sources (as described in WP:GNG. Dschslava (talk) 18:18, 10 April 2016 (UTC)

Crimea annexation RfC
I've opened an RfC on Talk: Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation on the question

"Should the information about opinion polls, currently in the subsection be moved into the subsection ?"

As you recently edited this talk page, I thought you might like to share your views. Kalidasa 777 (talk) 00:11, 11 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 April 2016
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

Douglas Self
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. SmilingFace (talk) 22:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Titan Radio
Hello Dschslava. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Titan Radio, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Things associated with Cal State, even student radio stations, may pass WP:GNG because... well, they are associated with Cal State. Maybe a redirect to California State University, Fullerton?''' Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 11:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * yes, I suppose that sounds more reasonable than what I had initially proposed. Dschslava (talk) 22:15, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * No wukkas, as we say in Koalaland. It's up for speedy deletion again, but I'm not going to bust a gut about this.
 * Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 11:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 April 2016
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:43, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion
Hi dschslav I would like to ask you why did you nominate my article nenad Radulovich for speedy deletion I would like to hear your opinion why you think it should be removed please repply back thank you. ApocalypseDoomer (talk) 05:08, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * my rationale is based off of WP:ACADEMIC. Dschslava (talk) 05:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Now I understand but does this mean my article will be removed? ApocalypseDoomer (talk) 05:17, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * yes, probably. Oh, and there's no need to ping me on my own talk page. Dschslava (talk) 05:31, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 20:47, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXXI, April 2016
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 01:38, 30 April 2016 (UTC)