User talk:Ishani204

Your submission at Articles for creation: Top 50 IT Companies' List (World) (July 30)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lovkal was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Top 50 IT Companies' List (World) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Top 50 IT Companies' List (World), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Top_50_IT_Companies%27_List_(World) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Lovkal&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Top_50_IT_Companies%27_List_(World) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

lovkal (talk) 22:12, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Top 50 IT Companies' List (World) (August 1)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Top_50_IT_Companies%27_List_(World) Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by ReaderofthePack was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This has a couple of issues:


 * The first is that the lead paragraph is written in first person rather than the neutral third person that Wikipedia prefers. Avoid using words like "you" and "I" as Wikipedia should not come across like it was written by a specific person for a specific person/audience.
 * The second is that if I'm reading the lead correctly, this is a list of companies that you personally see as the top IT companies in the world, which you've based on personal research. Some of the sources are outlets' lists of what they see are the best, but the issue here is that we cannot use several individual lists to justify one single list as each of those individual lists may have had their own different criteria - or they may have included their own personal opinions or biases into the selection. As such, a list of this nature would be considered original research.


 * When it comes to lists of the best or top whatevers, Wikipedia cannot create the list themselves - it has to be an already existing list, such as YouTube's list of most followed channels, the NYT's bestseller lists, and so on. The list must also be notable, by which I mean that there needs to be coverage about that specific list in reliable sources. A list in and of itself isn't going to be automatically notable, even if the list topic would be notable companies as the list wouldn't inherit that notability.

ReaderofthePack (formerly Tokyogirl79)  (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Janjehli (August 1)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Amkgp was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Janjehli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Janjehli, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Janjehli Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Amkgp&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Janjehli reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~ Amkgp 💬  12:55, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Visual impairment. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Graham 87 07:40, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Graham 87 07:46, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
 * All you've done is spammed the lead section of articles with poor-quality info (and sometimes links). You are not welcome here. Graham 87 07:52, 7 August 2020 (UTC)


 * You will also need to address your clearly promotional draft articles. CaptainEek  Edits Ho Cap'n!⚓ 07:55, 10 August 2020 (UTC)