User talk:Ishdarian/Archives/2010/September

BAF
Read the discussion page for Bagram Air Base, I explained why I did it. Basically, even the USAF calls it Airfield on the website now, plus the numbers excuse holds zero water as the most incorrect response (Bagram Air Field) gets the most hits. There are literally no excuses left to continue calling it by the incorrect name. That being said, I am sure that it'll continue to get rolled back until the consensus is agreed upon, once again, to ignore every possible fact available and continue to call it by the wrong name. P.S. I'm super shocked that you're in the Air Force and want to insist on pretending that the base is somehow your service's. It's not. P.P.S. Aim High! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.22.63.1 (talk) 13:49, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm Ishdarian. I am really neat. Agreed. Ishdarian's a super cool dude who will fix humorous edits on the most minor things on here within minutes. Oh, what ever would Wiki do without him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.234.116.15 (talk) 07:35, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm glad you agree! Unfortunately, Wikipedia isn't a comedy club, so there is no room for "humorous edits" here. Sorry! Ishdarian&#124; lol wut 07:38, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Okay, so I have to ask: are you into noise, or are you protecting the article about R.R. the serial killer and caught my edit that way? Or do you just keep an eye on everything, all the time? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.234.116.15 (talk) 07:47, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
 * The latter. I saw it, and I corrected it. Ishdarian&#124; lol wut 07:49, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, that's what I was thinking. I'm into noise and that R.R. does a complete disservice to the REAL night stalker. Anyhow, I understand your commitment and won't try and re-edit...but between you and me, everything I added was the absolute truth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 169.234.116.15 (talk) 07:54, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

List of Paravar last names
I've removed your PROD as the article was PRODded and contested before, therefore not eligible. Meanwhile, we edit conflicted on the article - I was AfDing while you were PRODding, so the deletion request is at a different venue now. cheers. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  08:27, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * My appologies. Thanks for clearing that up! Ishdarian&#124; lol wut 08:28, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
 * No worries at all, it was easy to miss, I missed it initially too. cheers. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  08:30, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Question regarding rollback actions
Please could you explain why you used the rollback button on these two edits: and ? Minima c  ( talk ) 11:11, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I thought that since the user was evading a block and putting in information that has been rejected previously that it would constitute as vandalism. Ishdarian&#124; lol wut 11:14, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * I made a mistake on that one: I see you reverted a contribution by a blocked IP sockpuppet and I have re-instated your edit. Sorry about that! Minima  c  ( talk ) 11:17, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
 * No worries! Thanks for staying vigilant! Ishdarian&#124; lol wut 11:18, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello sir,
This is Dharani Maran,I am new to wikipedia.I have come across your word in the Paravar article discussion.I added some scholarly researches and sangam literature evidences for Paravar claim of Pandyan descendance. Herewith I have attached a link of scholarly reference you were asking. History of the Tamils: from the earliest times to 600 A.D.

By P. T. Srinivasa Iyengar

ndian Hist (Opt)

By Reddy

Śaṅgam polity:the administration and social life of the Śaṅgam Tamils

N. Subrahmanian Paravars are said to be ferocious warriors here.

Caste, race and religion in India Sarat Chandra Roy (Rai Bahadur)

South Indian studies

Harōgadde Mānappa Nāyaka, Balakrishnan Raja Gopal, T. V. Mahalingam

But,their some articles stating that paravar are low caste,those articles were written at the time,when paravars ie)pandyas lost their power and status.Pandyas are believed to be at their zenith during sangam ages.Literatures belonging to that sangam ages clearly depict that Paravar are noble people.Controversies arise every where,Even in case of Jesus,few worship him as god and few say him a man.These kind of controversies are common.We have to consider the chronology factor.Researchers of 19th century,take the evidences available to them at that point of time to consideration and come to a conclusion.Also,they might have been influenced by the rulers at that particular time,who might have defamed and defeated the early pandyas.So,I request every one who debate and discuss over pandyan descendancy to consider the time factor.Just go through sangam literature.Proofs are explicit to state Paravars(Parathavar) and Maravars are Pandyas.Both belong to the same roots of ancestry.The Maravars and Paravars alone carried the surname of Pandyas in their name before muslim invasion.

Being new to wikipedia,I am not able to understand the terms and conditions of wiki.I have given scholarly research evidences,historical evidences,inscriptions and sangam literatures as proofs.Even then,the tag says original research.Kindly help me out in this issue.Also,kindly ignore the articles saying paravar as low caste,with out proofs from ancient tamil text.

Thank you Dharani Maran —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dharani Maran (talk • contribs) 11:58, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Barnstars and shtuff
Honestly I don't know myself. You could check out WP:BARN; I'm heading for bed at the moment, plus I need to work on something important tomorrow. I'll be back here if I remember to look for it, and/or find it.—  Dæ dαlus Contribs 09:50, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Pourquoi Story
I'm sorry if I offended you with my comments on the pourquoi story, it was nit my intention. I was simply attempting to make a statement about why it is acceptable to label one culture's religious beliefs as fiction (note comments made about Australian Aboriginal Dreaming stories) and not another's. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.173.212.89 (talk) 07:30, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Please refer to WP:POINT. Also, did you try bringing it up on the article's talk page? Ishdarian&#124; lol wut 07:32, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Requests for comments. Please look at history!
There was already a "request for comment" for two weeks, but nobody bothered to comment. See this revision : http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Yoni_Jesner_and_Ahmed_Khatib&oldid=384617180 --89.139.219.61 (talk) 13:06, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for merging ???
Articles for merging?? "Maybe you should propose the merge there"??? This is just a test page, a proposal, not a page where you can propose mergers. All the procedure of Mergers has been done, and the result was that there was no objection to merge. Please see wp:MERGE for information concerning mergers. If no one objects with a reasonable reason in a considerable time, a merger can take place. 89.139.219.61 (talk) 13:42, 29 September 2010 (UTC)