User talk:Ishdarian/Archives/2013/August

pplss reply
pls reply — Preceding unsigned comment added by Krishmohandev (talk • contribs) 06:25, 7 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Hi there! Unfortunately, just because she has a YouTube channel, it doesn't automatically make her notable. Try adding more reliable sources to the article, especially for the claim that she is the first Malayalam vlogger. Her article falls under the standards for biographies of living persons, which means it's held to a higher standard.
 * Also, please don't spam my talk page with multiple messages. I saw the first one and I'm a slow typist. :)  Ish dar  ian  06:32, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Why
For what reasons you sent me message and want this page to deleted — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonnyzhamat (talk • contribs) 06:57, 7 August 2013 (UTC)


 * The article you had created seem to only exist to promote a blog. Also, it made no claims to significance. You should take a look at WP:FIRST, which gives some great advice on creating your first article.  Ish dar  ian  07:14, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:37, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Deletion, 10xONE page
Hi, just wanted to know if it was you deleting my 10xONE page.

Please let me know what to do to make it better. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pczernecki (talk • contribs) 18:06, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:05, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. Article title help
Ishdarian I acknowledge that my testing was not the correct way to go about making a page, thank you.

I also found that there was a properly cited page already in existence --> []

But it's not titled properly, do you know if there's a way we could edit that portion of the article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Distilleryrat (talk • contribs) 18:32, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

learn seo
Hi Ishdarian The article Ishdarian is neither a spam not it is for promotional purpose. The main aim of this article is to get people understand about seo. this is also helpful to all. there is nothing written wrong nor any data which promote any product.

I request you to please remove the tag which you have applied at the top. although its up to you how you take the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterthomos000 (talk • contribs) 10:19, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, but it is very much promotional. It's written in first person describing services offered by a blogspot site that makes not real claim to notability.  Ish dar  ian  10:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

as you wish then thank you... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterthomos000 (talk • contribs) 11:11, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

NDI Deletion
Hi,

I was trying to write an article on the company but got most of the information from their website. They're very well known in the UK, working with and helping lots of manufacturers find contracts. They were previously Government funded so are very well known in their respected industries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BryceWilcock (talk • contribs) 10:33, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * @: Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, however, the article is written entirely in first person and appears to serve only as a promotional vehicle for the company. In addition, noticed that the entire article is a copyright violation as it was lifted directly from the company's website. Before creating another article, you should really take a look at WP:FIRST, which gives some great advice for editors working on their first article.  Ish  dar  ian  10:39, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Additionally, the notability of the company doesn't look promising. I did a Google search and well, nothing much came up. : Unfortunately, the article doesn't appear to meet WP:42. User:Insulam Simia (going to change sig, didn't know that was going to happen) 12:12, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:58, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions
We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:


 * Views/Day : Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
 * Quality : Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:


 * Content : Is more content needed?
 * Headings : Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
 * Images : Is the number of illustrative images about right?
 * Links : Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
 * Sources : For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:34, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion - Australian Voice Party
Don't understand your objection - Wikepedia has no details listed for Australian Voice which is a registered Political Party - I have submitted then details and you have a problem which i am yet to understand. Please advise the concern that you have so that it may be addressed - Keith Douglas president@av.org.au Keithdouglasavp (talk) 08:01, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi Keith, and welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, not every registered party meets the notability standards set forth by Wikipedia. In addition, a key thing your article is missing at present is any kind of reliable sourcing. As a newly-formed party, the bar for notability doesn't appear to be reached at present. Feel free to add sources to the article; I am not at all familiar with Australian politics, so I don't know if the AVP is causing a political revival of sorts, but I may just be taking a U.S.-centric view of the situation.  Ish dar  ian  08:13, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

sorry for your inconvenience. I'm writing it, it is on the process, wait for few hours. Please review it after that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Packmania (talk • contribs) 08:19, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Khan jabir
Hello Ishdarian, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I deleted Khan jabir, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow and specific, and the process is more effective if the correct criterion is used. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Rschen7754 08:23, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Ishdarian, Sorry for my mistake in my article of "Chandra Nath Shastri". I was a early submission error from my end. Now I have put all the references needed for the article. Please review the article now and please save it from get deleted. If you take back your proposal od deletion for the Article I'll be very thankful to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Packmania (talk • contribs) 10:18, 30 August 2013 (UTC)

Contest Deletion of My Article
Sir, I'm Mather31 Please don't Delete my Article. It's my autobiography. :( I Just Share my Biography to others :( — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mather31 (talk • contribs) 10:32, 30 August 2013 (UTC)