User talk:Ishdarian/Archives/2013/December

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:19, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

you made a mistake
just chill man — Preceding unsigned comment added by Petdefiler (talk • contribs) 23:25, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Potential sockpuppet of Levineps
Recently, User:Oriole85 (contribs) has been sporadically popping up on my watchlist for category-related changes. A lot of new users do that, so it wasn't a particularly noteworthy thing for me. But then he kept showing up with a higher frequency, oftentimes making (what I thought to be) completely unnecessary over-categorizations to articles. I've been on Wikipedia long enough to know that User:Levineps (contribs) is one of the most notorious over-categorizers we've ever seen (and has the community sanctions, block records, and bans to show for it). So, I did about two minutes' worth of research and discovered that Oriole85's account was created / his edits began on November 5, 2013. When was the last edit by Levineps? November 4, 2013. That is not a coincidence IMO. I don't have (a) the time right now, nor (b) the motivation to formally open an SPI, but I'm hoping that one of the many people I'm notifying about this does. If you're wondering why you're being pinged about this, it's because I saw where you were one of the people who has left messages on Levineps' talk page at some point regarding his inappropriate editing. So now, in addition to all of the aforementioned issues with Levineps, it looks like a probably sockpuppet to throw into the mix. Jrcla2 (talk) 05:27, 5 December 2013 (UTC)


 * ping! Sockpuppet investigations/Levineps filed.  Ish dar  ian  06:48, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Armenians in Cyprus
Seriously? Really? Have we lost essence for the sake of "rules"?

The changes I made (commas mainly) has nothing to do with the block situation. If you are really so keen on me not making any changes, just make them yourself, but do make them, because they are important. Neo ^ (talk) 07:11, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The changes you made DO have to do with the restrictions. The very first restriction is You may make no edits to the article whatsoever, even spelling fixes or vandalism reversion. You were told to bring up the changes on the talk page, which you failed to do. I still check in on the talk page from time to time. You were unblocked with restrictions and you are expected to follow them. If you want to have them lifted, that's a discussion you should be having with Nyttend, since he is the admin who imposed them. I'm more than willing to let you off with a warning, but that isn't my decision to make.  Ish dar  ian  07:22, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * I am saying it again, we have lost essence for form... Neo ^ (talk) 07:25, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You were blocked for being disruptive. You were unblocked under the condition, which you accepted, that you not edit the article. At all. Again, bring it up with Nyttend if you want the restrictions lifted.  Ish dar  ian  07:30, 7 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Do you consider commas a disruption? I have contacted him. I'm just saying you should use logic first and then proceed with reverting edits on the grounds of some stupid rules. Neo ^ (talk) 07:49, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Please restore FIBEP article
Media monitoring is a unique niche industry and it is difficult to find good overview material on this subject. FIBEP is one of a very few key organizations bringing together companies in this field (which is positioned in a confluence of several key industries: journalism, public relations, media, etc.) - the only one I'm aware of in this specific field. As such I believe it deserves an encyclopedia entry.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Terri.hitchen — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.114.128.119 (talk) 01:40, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Covert Messaging and Harassment
I speedy deleted this article. Since you had previously prodded it, you might wish to comment here where I've replied to a query on my talk page.  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:15, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:41, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

IIC
Thank you for the information i didn't know this as i am a new editor. I am removing the external link attached with IIC but keeping the full form. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avdesh Kumar Singh (talk • contribs) 06:03, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 12:52, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

i understand
'''I understand the reasons for deleting my joey graceffa page. If you will, please make a joey graceffa page containing the right information. i am new to this so if you could will you please make one. if any questions or concerns, contact me by sending me a message. LOVE FOREVER AND ALWAYS, Cheerbaby24 <3'''
 * Timestamp.  Ish dar  ian  07:52, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Upper
Hi Ishdarian,

This is in reference to Tokyogirl. This young lady made a page I was planning to make accurately and filled it with inaccurate information, and it is obvious she is trying to slander anthers creative work. Sorry if anything I said came off as hostile, but being a long time supporter of this project it is sad to see someone trying to make it look bad, stating untrue things, when they have no knowledge of it and have never seen it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BigGameFish (talk • contribs) 07:46, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry BigGameFish, but I can see nothing but good faith edits coming from Tokyogirl. The synopsis is accurate, from what I've seen in the sourcing. Also, the summary you have tried to add is a copyright violation, something we take very seriously. I don't see her trying to attack anyone's work; she's simply repeating what was found in the sources. I highly suggest you read WP:AGF and WP:NPA before continuing, because your additude at present is problematic and continuing down that path may get you blocked.  Ish dar  ian  07:52, 20 December 2013 (UTC)


 * I've reported him to 3RR for his edit warring. Also, sorry about reverting your edit Ishdarian, I've fixed that. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   08:21, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * No worries. These things happen :)  Ish dar  ian  08:22, 20 December 2013 (UTC)

Promo edits at William Packer
Good Afternoon Staff Sergeant Ishdarian! :-) I'm a bit involved here with William Packers page. I added a comment below yours on talk page. I also added a sub heading "Possible promotional editing" just above your comments, mainly to make them easy to find under the main Dec. 2013 section heading. Feel free to remove it if you object as it is, sort of, altering your post.

It appears that the editor does have a strong COI, see here. Regards, 220  of  Borg 05:37, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads up, 220. I checked and I have no objections as it does provide some clarity. I checked the link you provided and I agree that the COI is strong with this one.  Ish dar  ian  05:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Happy-To-Help-Staff-Sergeant!
 * Paraphrasing Morbius in Forbidden Planet, 'That’s all right, Staff Sergeant. A commanding officer doesn’t need brains, (or correct  spelling) just a good, loud voice.' :-) source. 220  of  Borg 06:45, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Ouch. :)  Ish dar  ian  07:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:01, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

why you doing such dirty anti-societic deeds ... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunsingh2 (talk • contribs) 20:00, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the edit summary that clears things up. I hope that you know that I wasn't vandalizing. I got caught by the trap of the rotating socks. Apologies that I didn't catch it sooner. Thanks for your vigilance. MarnetteD | Talk 05:46, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry, Marnette. I should have made that clearer the first time. By no means was I meaning to accuse you of vandalism. I saw what was going on and tried fixing it. Evlekis did a swell job at getting everyone all fuckered up.  Ish dar  ian  05:49, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * You got that right. Thanks for the reply. Holly Jolly wishes to you and yours. Cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 05:55, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Stormfool returns
I think you have things backward. This editor appears to be a vandal, probably the same editor as "Try and stop me arsewipes!". You've been reverting MarnetteD's proper deletions of Stormfool's vandalism. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:50, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * BMK: No. Both of those socks are . He's the one who inserted the false info and used another sock to revert the addition in an attempt to get certain people to go back to his misinformation.  Ish dar  ian  05:53, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * BMK. I think that this might help User talk:C.Fred. Someone is spinning us around and I hope that means extra lumps of coal in their SOCK MarnetteD | Talk 05:55, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Agreed. I got fooled. --Malerooster (talk) 05:57, 25 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Isdharian's got it. Master of Spoof was the original vandal. Try and stop… was likely the same person laying a trap to make us revert back in the bad data. Further, the additions are bad data, bringing in material from articles with the same title. For a prime example, look at Mike Smith (American football coach), born in 1959—but the text that Master of Spoof added is about a different Mike Smith, who was 18 in 1962. —C.Fred (talk) 06:00, 25 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Well, that was an enjoyable experience. Merry Chirstmas, everyone!  Ish dar  ian  06:05, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

DO you know Rajpurohit word, that's a caste.. so the documentation will be about the caste..You telling that caste articles may be controversial! Actually there's nothing that raises controversial issues ... How a particular caste detail can do problem to another particulars. There is a huge mass of Rajpurohitians that want the page seem like i have created. so dont remove the fact details.

DO you know Rajpurohit word, that's a caste.. so the documentation will be about the caste..You telling that caste articles may be controversial! Actually there's nothing that raises controversial issues ... How a particular caste detail can do problem to another particulars. There is a huge mass of Rajpurohitians that want the page seem like i have created. so dont remove the fact details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arunsingh2 (talk • contribs) 07:43, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

IIC is an institute in University of Delhi, India
hi Ishdarian, This is regarding the page 'iic'. Institute of Informatics and Communication is an autherized and one of the premier college of University of Delhi. So i dont think there is any problem with that. As i am new at wikipedia please suggest me if i am doing some wromg editing of this page 'iic'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Avdesh Kumar Singh (talk • contribs) 17:17, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:36, 31 December 2013 (UTC)