User talk:Ishiho555

Speedy deletion of Andrew O'Desky
A tag has been placed on Andrew O'Desky, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD a7.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Blair - Speak to me 23:40, 19 September 2007 (UTC)

You are not blocked and if you are autoblocked, we cannot do anything unless you supply us with the IP you are using.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龍 ) 00:00, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Please follow the instructions here. The Evil Spartan 00:36, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

September, 2007
Hello Ishiho555!

I received your message on my TalkPage, and I do not interpret your message as any sign of disrespect. Thank you for contacting me, and thank you for being kind with your words.

Wikipedia does encourage being bold when reverting vandalism. Unfortunately, this means that from time-to-time, genuine edits are reverted and accused of being vandalism, when there was no intent. This is especially the case when original edits do not include a reference that can be reviewed. From my personal perspective, the inclusion of proper names can sometimes look like an editor is trying to ridicule someone by including their name in an article where it does not belong.

I encourage you to put your edit back, and please include the source from which your information comes. You have my word that I will not revert it. I am also removing the warning that I placed above, since I was mistaken, and feel that I should not only apologize, but attempt to right the wrong that I have created.

Have a peaceful day! LonelyBeacon 23:05, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

November 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Niels Bohr, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Niels Bohr was changed by Ishiho555 (c) (t) blanking the page on 2007-11-02T15:19:30+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 15:19, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. —EncMstr 15:41, 2 November 2007 (UTC)