User talk:Iskang15/Evaluate an Article

Hi, nice job on your article evaluation. You did a good job pointing to things in the article that you might be able to improve in the course of the class project. That said I think there were some aspects of the article that you could have additionally addressed, namely:
 * Did any of external links in the article not work?
 * Did the article have a neutral point of view and include diverse perspectives?
 * Is the content up to date?
 * Did the lead do a good job defining the topic and presenting a concise overview of the article?

I suggest that you briefly update evaluation to note how the article does at these aspects and make sure you thoroughly understand what makes good Wikipedia article. This is important to help you easily find ways to improve the article you chose to develop.

I also think this seems like a reasonable choice for an article to work on. There is clearly room to improve upon it as you described in your evaluation. It also seems clear that the subject of the article is notable. I'm a little bit concerned that you might have some trouble finding reliable sources to draw on for the content you plan to add. I suggest getting a head start on finding sources. Please don't hesitate to reach out to me if you have any questions or want some help deciding if a source is a good one. Groceryheist (talk) 00:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)