User talk:Islam0wisdom

Welcome!

 * }

April 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Tariq Ramadan has been reverted. Your edit here to Tariq Ramadan was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-spKm13v6c) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 09:20, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Tariq Ramadan, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ''Articles should be based on secondary sources, for instance newspaper accounts of the debate, rather than primary sources, for instance video of the debate itself. The phrase "many people say" is unacceptable. Who are "many people"? Would "many people" also say the opposite? '' GabrielF (talk) 16:10, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Christopher Hitchens, you may be blocked from editing. McGeddon (talk) 12:01, 17 April 2013 (UTC)