User talk:Islamdefence

Welcome!
Hello, Islamdefence, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * The Teahouse, our help forum for new users

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, visit the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. --Bamyers99 (talk) 19:31, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. El_C 20:49, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

I did not.I gave references to books Islamdefence (talk) 15:47, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

I have deleted it and learnt better. Can you help me with attaching citations? Islamdefence (talk) 17:15, 30 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Please review WP:REFBEGIN. Please do not submit edits until they are ready to be published. Use preview to ensure that. I'm sorry, but competency is expected on Wikipedia, so if you continue to place articles into a state of disrepair, you may be restricted from editing those articles. Thanks and good luck. El_C 17:40, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

I recently added new information to the page,Is it fine with you? Islamdefence (talk) 23:32, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Critisicm of the Hadith of the Ark moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Critisicm of the Hadith of the Ark, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:15, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Criticism of the Hadith of the Ark


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Criticism of the Hadith of the Ark requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ~ Amkgp 💬  17:28, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Help:Maintenance template removal, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. SuperMarioMan (Talk) 12:42, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Image copyright?
Hi, you added an image to the article on beeni, which you claim as your own work. However, the image appears in an online news article from 2018, which is cited as one of the sources. Can you clarify whether you are indeed the photographer, and have managed to get your photo published in the newspaper in question? For now I've commented out (removed) the image from the article, awaiting your reply. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:35, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Islamdefence


A tag has been placed on User:Islamdefence requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. GPL93 (talk) 16:10, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Draft:Critisicm of the Hadith of the Ark


The page Draft:Critisicm of the Hadith of the Ark has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://www.twelvershia.net/2019/04/24/hadith-al-safinah-is-not-authentic-from-shia-sources/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review SuperMarioMan (Talk) 22:19, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2021
Your edit to Malik ibn Nuwayrah has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 20:15, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Layla bint al-Minhal
 * added a link pointing to Expedition of Khalid ibn al-Walid
 * Malik ibn Nuwayrah
 * added a link pointing to Expedition of Khalid ibn al-Walid

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 18 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Your edit to Abd al-Rahman al-Awza'i has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:25, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

What i quoted was from a primary source. It was from the Musnad Abu Hanifa which was written by the students of Abu Hanifa. According to my knowledge, there is no copyright on primary sources Islamdefence (talk) 15:16, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Beeni for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beeni is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Beeni until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Iskandar323 (talk) 14:20, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Beeni is a sport played in the Indian subcontinent. It is not made up and it is important for people to be made aware of this growing sport Islamdefence (talk) 23:41, 8 January 2022 (UTC)


 * I said "it is not convincingly notable from the perspective of Wikipedia's standards", not non-existant. Iskandar323 (talk) 09:22, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

It is true that the sport may not be very popular in many areas in the world but it is immensely popular among locals in rural areas and towns in south Asia. I would argue that it is notable but simply not many people know about it to research and develop the article.

Disambiguation link notification for April 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ghadir Khumm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arafat.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello, I'm Apaugasma. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mu'awiya I, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 19:14, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, it is largely true that Shias do hold Muawiyah responsible to a large extent for the martyrdom of Imam Hussain. Apart from a few prominent individuals who opposed Muawiyah's selection of Yazeed, Muawiyah was also to persuade, at least passively, the majority of Umayyad Elites, including Marwan I, to accept the rulership of Yazeed. Islamdefence (talk) 19:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Mu'awiya I, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * It is a historical fact, beyond the need of sources that Muawiyah did not intervene in the Battle of The Camel militarily. This is a fact that is agreed by both Sunnis and Shias. Islamdefence (talk) 19:20, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Please read the warnings and click their links. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Mu'awiya I, you may be blocked from editing. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:28, 9 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I believe you may have a conflict of interest as per your name and the topic being discussed. I am simply stating a historical fact that Muawiyah did not declare war on either side during the Battle of the Camel and did not intervene militarily. Do you wish to dispute this? Also, threats will not be tolerated and will be reported. Islamdefence (talk) 19:31, 9 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Kindly keep these theories about me to yourself per WP:ASPERSIONS and WP:NPA. And feel free to report me, will save me the time. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:12, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Hi Islamdefence! On Wikipedia, we need to make sure that all content is verifiable per our core policy Verifiability. Readers need to be able to ascertain for themselves in a reliable source that what we are writing is accurate.

Re, please note that this section is about the events themselves, not about how Sunni Muslims regard them vs how Shi'i Muslims regard them. Such information, if it is wp:due to mention at all, would belong in the Mu'awiya I section.

A better approach overall is to start by reading relevant reliable sources, and then adding a summary of what you have read in your own words to the Wikipedia article. That way you have a source and chances that it is due to mention are much higher. ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 19:33, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of the Camel. HistoryofIran (talk) 20:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)