User talk:Islamic11111

November 2014
Please do not add or change content, as you did to Shirk (Islam), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Also, your personal thought is not fit for an encyclopedia. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:34, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Athari
Hi, I noticed that you removed some sourced content from the Athari article. In future it would be useful to explain why rather than make a polemic statement such as "sufis are not atharis, sufis are not muslims, sufis are apostates, sufis follow shirk and kalam of jews.". Thanks RookTaker (talk) 18:17, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Attacks by IP addresses
You and I have had some disagreements on Tawhid and Salafi movement, specifically about my removal of material you added to Tawhid and comments you made on Talk:Salafi movement. Several IP addresses - 23.27.249.130, 31.52.139.225 and 216.172.142.237 - have now started to harass me personally and throw around accusations on those articles, in edit summaries and on my talk page. Do you have anything to do with this? MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:40, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

I use wikipedia only with my login Islamic11111. Islamic11111 (talk) 06:47, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Changing text you have posted on a talk page
Please could you read WP:REDACT.

When you are changing something you posted some hours before the convention is to use strike-through instead of deleting. For example:
 * What I mean is that Salafism is in my opinion the obvious initial name corresponding to the Arabic Salafiyya. I understood that the Arabs do use initially the name Salafiyya. As I said Arabs use the ending "iyya" to mean all kinds of religious teachings. Islamic11111 (talk) 09:27, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:59, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your continual re-editing and redacting of your talk page comments. It is disruptive! Please abide by Wikipedia policies WP:REDACT.-- Toddy1 (talk) 23:33, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or change other editors' legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Wahhabism‎. -- Toddy1 (talk) 23:41, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Next time you delete my comments from Talk:Wahhabism‎ this is going to WP:ANI.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:21, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Your disruptive behaviour at Wahhabism
Do not trade religious insults and name-calling as you have just done on the article talk page. Wikipedia is not a forum. I have deleted several of your posts from the article's talk page. Do it again and I'll begin an WP:ANI thread to have you blocked. DeCausa (talk) 14:14, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)