User talk:Ismailcanli

Thank you for experimenting with the page Çiğli on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Gimboid13 09:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Çiğli. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Gimboid13 09:39, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia... but about the article Çiğli...
It is nice of you to attempt to give Wikipedia information about Çiğli, but unfortunately, your information format is not accepted by Wikipedia's guidelines for creating articles. Please read Wikipedia's Manner of Style for writing articles. Thank you. -- Ķĩřβȳ ♥  Ťįɱé  Ø  10:29, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Cigli.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cigli.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 11:05, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Deletion tags
If you disagree with a proposal for speedy deletion, add a hang on template, but do not remove the tag. Removing speedy deletion tags is considered to be vandalism.--Anthony.bradbury 13:29, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Cigli.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Cigli.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Scienceman123 02:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Çiğli.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Çiğli.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 13:51, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Your recent edits on Turkey, the Wikipedia article
Isn't that old data (2006 or earlier)? Please revert if that is the case, because we have newer data. See Talk:Turkey —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.211.202.45 (talk) 10:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Turkey
I apologize for my mistaken warning to you earlier. The odd characters in what turned out to be a footnote misled me into thinking the article had been filled with funny characters. I have been assured that this is good information. Thank you for your contribution. Student7 (talk) 14:04, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Kale Kilit
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kale Kilit, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.kalekilit.com.tr/en/company/tarihce.asp. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:33, 2 December 2008 (UTC)