User talk:Isoetid

Welcome
Hello, Isoetid, and welcome to Wikipedia! It appears you are a course instructor leading a class project.


 * New to Wikipedia or want to learn about best practices for Wikipedia assignments?

The training includes instructions for setting up a structured course page, with tools for tracking student work and encouraging peer review. Please also see this helpful advice for instructors.

If you run into problems or want some feedback on your Wikipedia assignment plans, try posting to the education noticeboard.

We hope you like it here and encourage you to stay after your assignment is finished! -- samtar talk or stalk 14:32, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

"Collaborative grading"
Hi, and I are having a discussion over at. Since your students' work is "live" in the article namespace, we've done some editing to improve the articles. Sminthopsis84 reverted some of our changes to Viburnum dilatatum in particular, and I restored them, on the basis that your course doesn't "own" the articles. I appreciate that you're willing to engage with the Wikipedia community as part of your teaching, but part of that is the expectation of working collaboratively. In some cases, Sminthopsis84, myself, or other editors might improve on (or revert!) changes made by students, but we're concerned that our actions could unfairly help (in the case of improvements) or harm (in the case of reversions) your students' grades. This is particularly relevant if our attention to particular articles wasn't evenly applied. We could wait a few days (for the assignment to be "complete") before wading in to aggressively improve the weakest parts, but I'd prefer to start that sooner. Do you have a strong opinion here? {&#123; Nihiltres &#8202;&#124;talk&#8202;&#124;edits}&#125; 15:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

I appreciate the message. I had hoped and counseled the students not to "overwrite" short stubs or more developed existing articles but to move pieces of their writing over bit by bit, but they quickly figured out that you can use the Move function from their respective Sandboxes, and alas many of them took the path of least resistance (for them). Of course please make edits or revert their changes as you or anyone in the community see's fit at any time. I asked them to send me a word document with their article that I am using for grading, please don't feel you or anyone else needs to wait for me to grade the live wikipedia pages. Thank you for your consideration.Isoetid (talk) 17:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)