User talk:Ispy1981/Archive May 2007

??????
How is putting how much carbon dioxide JMF takes out of the air vandalism? 172.191.21.207 00:41, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

User:CINEGroup
Just a word of friendly advice: I think it complicates matters to try and demonstrate that this user is actually some other user, or trying to do something nefarious. Basically, his behavior as it is is disruptive enough, and I suspect accusing him of things like being the sock of a more experienced user only inflames the situation. Because while I find some of what you say about it suggestive, it's hardly conclusive. I'd prefer that this dispute remain purely about User:CINEGroup's current editing behavior. But it's just my 2 cents. Cheers. Dina 15:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd like to suggest that you strike your accusations to him on WP:AN/I (using the "strike" tag if you're familiar with it.) He's responding, the issue has become muddled, and frankly, it's all besides the point. Cheers. Dina 22:08, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Please chill on WP:AN/I. Don't take the bait, there's no point.  The only way to "resolve" an on-wiki dispute about whether or not someone "is" who they say they are is to reveal personal info about them, which isn't cool.  So let it go.  The issue here, as I say above, has nothing to do with his website, or profession, or whatever, but his behavior.  Please let it be about that.  Cheers. Dina 22:22, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * You obviously have the right to do whatever you want. I'm just suggesting, as gently as possible, that tangling with a disruptive user about his identity on WP:AN/I gets us no where.  To me, this has nothing to do with the Essjay thing, as well, there's really no danger of this particular user becoming a highly respected and trusted editor.  I mean, really, he means probably no harm but he's been blocked twice in his first couple of weeks.  So why pour fuel on the fire?  He's his own worst enemy frankly...Cheers. Dina 22:27, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The way I'd do it (and this is just a suggestion) is to say something like "striking as irrelevant to the discussion". In terms of wiki-markup the tags are  . It does something like this .  Cheers, thanks for being so reasonable in an unreasonable situation. I respect that a lot. Dina 22:32, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Userspace/main space
I've moved Ispy1981/Suspected aliases of CINEGroup to User:Ispy1981/Suspected aliases of CINEGroup. When creating subpages in your userspace, be sure they are actually in your User: space. The page was originally marked as vandalsim/nonsense because it was not an article, but was created in article space (main space). -  auburn pilot  talk  08:50, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

"Do not revert articles without good reason"
What are you talking about? You're the one that needs to take that advice. You have given no reason as to why that information should stay. TTN 00:53, 13 May 2007 (UTC)