User talk:Israel1st

March 2020
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Johannes Wahlström, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jeb3 Talk at me here What I've Done 14:19, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Johannes Wahlström, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Jeb3 Talk at me here What I've Done 14:22, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Johannes Wahlström. Jeb3 Talk at me here What I've Done 14:27, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Regarding alleged bias
If you feel something is unfounded, please utilise the talk page, and do not repeatedly edit an article to get your point across. Thepenguin9 (talk) 14:36, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing. If you believe you have good reasons for questioning the reliability of sourcing in an article, then explain why on a talk page, and be willing to discuss the issues with other editors with a view to trying to reach agreement. Simply reverting over and over again to one's own preferred version, ignoring what anyone else thinks, is not considered a helpful approach. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. JBW (talk) 14:40, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia's policy on edit-warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Johannes Wahlström; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.JBW (talk) 14:42, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.