User talk:Issamedin

Notice of discretionary sanctions
Please note that editors without Extended Confirmed status (30 days tenure and 500 edits) are prohibited from editing any pages or content related to the Palestine-Israel conflict. AmbivalentUnequivocality (talk) 02:55, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

August 2020
Hello, I'm MrOllie. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 21:25, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

August 2021
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of flags of Israel, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 17:08, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

That was never a flag of "Israel". Stop posting fake flags on Wikipedia. Issamedin (talk) 06:09, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at List of flags of Israel. Notfrompedro (talk) 11:32, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. It is clear that your purpose here is to remove content not in agreement with your personal point of view, and you have shown no willingness at all to edit collaboratively, rather than persisting with your own preferred things. You have shown no sign of considering what other editors have said, and have shown no interest in discussing your disagreements with other editors or in trying to reach agreement. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. JBW (talk) 19:25, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

You have a common misunderstanding of Wikipedia in that Wikipedia does not claim to be unbiased; everyone and everything has biases, including you and me. Wikipedia has a neutral point of view, which is different. Any bias in sources will be reflected in Wikipedia. The sources are presented to readers so they can evaluate and judge them for themselves as to bias and other factors. Only you can decide what is true for you; the only claim Wikipedia makes is that the information presented is verifiable. The Israeli/Palestinian conflict will not be solved here(or it would have been by now); this is why we stick to summarizing what independent reliable sources state. If you wish to challenge the reliability of a source, the reliable sources noticeboard is available, but a source being biased does not in and of itself prevent its use on Wikipedia, unless you are alleging that they just make stuff up. 331dot (talk) 07:46, 22 August 2021 (UTC)