User talk:ItWiki97

Welcome!

Hello, ItWiki97, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome!

– Fayenatic  L ondon 17:22, 24 April 2020 (UTC)

Archiving
I do not know why you reverted the bot at Wikipedia talk:Please do not bite the newcomers, but it was doing its appointed job of archiving the thread to an archive file, and your revert restored the article, which would soon be archived again, duplicating it. I have reverted you. Elizium23 (talk) 04:36, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I would like to know why the talk "Wikipedia talk:Please do not bite the newcomers" was removed..!! ItWiki97 (talk) 04:43, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * , it was removed because it was moved to the archive file. It was not needed on the main talk page anymore. In order to keep them short and current, old conversations are archived, and necessarily deleted from the talk page as the bot copies them into the archive file. OK? Elizium23 (talk) 04:44, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * I got it. But how could I access those archive files.. or some another archive files for future reference..!!?? :) ItWiki97 (talk) 04:48, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
 * There is usually a brown box atop the talk page that links to the archive files (the page in question has one, along with a search box that can search all 5 archive files for a phrase or word.) You can browse the archives one-at-a-time in chronological order, or you can search them for what you're looking for. They usually have a standard naming scheme so that they can be easily found. The names are under the tree hierarchy with a /, like "Talk:Wikipedia/Archive 1" or something. Different talk pages have different archive schemes and naming conventions. There are a couple of different bots which handle it for them. Elizium23 (talk) 04:57, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for helping me out. :) ItWiki97 (talk) 06:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Casting aspersions
After you were warned about commenting on other editors' backgrounds, you did it again; and worse, you accused a respected administrator of bad faith in editing based on your unsupported suspicions about their background. Please read No Personal Attacks. Comment only on edits, not on editors. Schazjmd  (talk)  19:55, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

@:Schazjmd I was not knowing about this earlier before. But thank you for your guidance. I will comply with all the Wikipedia Rules from hereafter.ItWiki97 (talk) 20:13, 1 May 2020 (UTC)ItWiki97

Indian Mutiny
Please read wp:brd and wp:or. If your edits are undone you (as in YOU) are supposed to make the case for inclusion.Slatersteven (talk) 10:18, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Talk posts
Should not really be edited after they have been replied to.Slatersteven (talk) 15:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)


 * @User:Slatersteven

The article should be edited.ItWiki97 (talk) 15:15, 5 May 2020 (UTC)ItWiki97
 * Read wp:talk.Slatersteven (talk) 15:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Removing reference
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and this is not a blog where you can write what you want.I have seen persistent removal of sourced materials from ur side.This is against the policy of Wikipedia.Though everyone is invited to edit.unsourced edit and personal opinion are not needed here. If you do that again[btw i am taking about Ranvir Sena ] i will have to complaint the administrators. Editor wikip6 (talk) 03:58, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

@wikip6 Hello. I don't think I have removed any reliable sources/references from the article Ranvir Sena. If you could produce any legitimate, proper and legal reference/source then you can edit the article as you wish to edit. Otherwise you have no right to edit any article which have no proper reference just for your personal grudge against any specific caste. And I don't think that the given article has any reliable sources which properly says that, the Sena used to have idealogy for Bhumihar caste supremacy. So, I am going to remove that part and if you think my removal of that part is not good, then you can give proper reference and edit the article and add that Ialogy for Bhumihar caste supremacy word. And if you have any specific problem, then you can drop messages here on my talkpage or can discuss the matter on the article page itself. Have a good day. ItWiki97 (talk) 06:05, 24 May 2020 (UTC)ItWiki97

First of all I have not edited that article before this is the first time I did just Cozoom of ur removal of that particular stuff second I have no grudge with any caste and I just told u what was my duty Editor wikip6 (talk) 06:28, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

I see it. But I don't think that the article has all of the reliable sources. It is also that the given said article has some unreliable sources from those people who happens to have personal grudge against this particular caste. Also, the part which says that Ranvir Sena used to have some Idealogy of Bhumihar Caste Supremacy is itself of dubious origin and it is without any proper reliable sources. Some sources/references here in this article is itself unreliable as it comes from those people who have their personal grudge against this caste. So, they can say anything to make all the things in their favour instead of sourcing Original and Reliable Correct information.

ItWiki97 (talk) 06:46, 24 May 2020 (UTC)ItWiki97

We don't have authority to decide.Wikipedia works upon sources and without sources u can't remove anything Editor wikip6 (talk) 07:25, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

But as I know, Wikipedia relies on proper verified reliable sources for any edit on any Article on Wikipedia rather than edit with no reliable sources. And, as I have said earlier the reliability of resources has been checked earlier on those Paswan and Ranvir Sena pages. But you have again reverted it without having any reliable sources which doesn't work here. Wikipedia has those experienced Wikipedians who can check the reliability of those sources as Wikipedian articles can be edited by anyone. So, there are many Wikipedian Administrator/ Vandalsim Checker to check the reliability of those sources which have been there on the Article page itself as on the basis of those resources only the edits reliability is checked. Any experienced Wikipedian Administrator/ Vandalism Checker/Reviewer is most warmly welcome from my side to check the reliability of the sources on these two pages.ItWiki97 (talk) 07:12, 27 May 2020 (UTC)ItWiki97

For replacement of any existing term also u need to give evidence Editor wikip6 (talk) 13:12, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

RemovaL of terms
Hello.....this is the second time I am saying this please stop unconstructive edits and Let it be an encyclopedia rather than caste 's promotional website .I think u are not aware of circumstances.please see General sanction Notification on ur talk page which Administrators has left for u regarding ur edits on Paswan and Ranvir Sena .If you want to add knowledge u r welcome but refrain from it what u'remember doing. Otherwise u will be permanently blocked Editor wikip6 (talk) 02:20, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

I don't think that I have did any unconstructive edits on these two Paswan and Ranvir Sena pages. As, I have said earlier, the reliability on the resources/ References on these two pages has been checked by a Wikipedian Editor. But again, you have reverted those edits. I have edited as per written in the References/ Sources. I would like to have a experienced Wikipedian once again to check the reliability of the References on these two Paswan and Ranvir Sena pages and is also allowed to check my edit on these two pages. I can't be blocked as I have edited respecting Wikipedian Rules and keeping reliability of the earlier refernces on these two pages. Also, I have not used edits for any caste glorification/promotion. Any experienced wikipedian is most warmly welcomed to check these two pages and can read the resouces. I have edited as per written in Wikipedian References/ Resources.ItWiki97 (talk) 07:30, 27 May 2020 (UTC)ItWiki97

As. Per my request ranvir Sena has been blocked by administrators and no one except them could edit it...and btw u are talking to an experienced Wikipedian.....don't think that I m here only from a month as my account shows Editor wikip6 (talk) 13:09, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Hello, I'm RegentsPark. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mangal Pandey, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. regentspark (comment) 19:32, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Chahamanas of Shakambhari. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alivardi  (talk)  13:50, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Disambiguation link notification for January 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mohyal Brahmin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Datta. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2022
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Chalukya Shiva Temple. Doug Weller talk 08:43, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello, User:Doug Weller.I have added the history part as per the Archaelogical Survey of India,India statement says about the same. I can mention some sites/ sources for adding history part or you yourself can check about Lad Khan Temple after googling about it and can see the images which is taken by people which tells about the ASI,India statement for the Lad Khan Temple. Then also, if any problem persists or Wikipedia policy is violated then the edited part could be removed. Thank You for guiding me about the Wikipedia Policy regarding the editing part of Wikipedia articles. User:ItWiki97 ItWiki97 (talk) 05:56, 28 January 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't see why I shouldn't block you now. Not only was your recent edit there completely unsourced, I had to delete it from the history of the article as it is a copyright violation from, at least,.
 * You need to cite your sources per Help:Referencing for beginners Doug Weller  talk 08:33, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

You have been pruned from a list
Hi ItWiki97! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 6 months.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting WikiProject History/Outreach/Participants.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) &#124; Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. &#124; Sent at 18:01, 22 August 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)