User talk:It takes us to be one andre bolongaita

Recent edit to Randy Santiago
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Randy Santiago, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 05:07, 11 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Montero has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Montero was changed by It takes us to be one andre bolongaita (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.922129 on 2015-02-13T09:03:06+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Babita arora  09:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at La Salle Green Hills, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: La Salle Green Hills was changed by It takes us to be one andre bolongaita (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.859603 on 2015-02-13T12:03:18+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:03, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 12:23, 13 February 2015 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 09:06, 15 February 2015 (UTC)