User talk:Itachi1452

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--æn↓þæµß¶-ŧ-¢ 11:41, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Editors that don't provide an edit summary tend to look like vandals
I have noticed you commonly don't enter an edit summary. This causes me problems. When I patrol for vandalism, I use the summary to make a preliminary decision on whether or not the post is a vandal edit or not. If the summary is present (or at least a section header, the part inside the /* */), I commonly decide the edit is legit and move on.

However, if no edit summary is available, I typically resort to loading the diff for the edit. This takes time. For that reason, if your edits are all valid, I ask that you provide edit summaries. For more on how to enter an edit summary, please read Help:Edit summary.

Incidentally, it is not just me that appreciate having edit summaries. When you omit your summary, you may be telling various bots that you are vandalizing pages. For this reason, please consider providing that summary. It is very important. You can enter that summary via the edit summary box on edit pages (as shown below).



The edit summary appears in black italics in the following places:
 * Page history - list of changes to the page you edited
 * User contributions - list of all your edits
 * Watchlist *  - list of recent changes to watched pages (logged-in users only)
 * diff page - shows the difference between two edits
 * Recent changes - list of all recent edits
 * Wikipedia IRC channels - real time list of all edits
 * Related changes - list of recent changes to pages linked to the page you edited
 * List of new pages: shows the edit summary of the creation.

 *  Use the enhanced watchlist to see all recent changes in the watched pages, not just the last change in each page.

For more tips on how to avoid being mistaken for a vandal, please visit Steps You Can Take to Avoid Being Thought of as a Vandal. Will (Talk - contribs) 04:08, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

look man, i didn't really change it. it was like that for a month, and everyone was happy. then someone deleted the prog metal part, so i simply put it back on. Itachi1452 23:45, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Regarding All That Remains (band)
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Leon Sword 23:01, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

Just a friendly tip
Hey, I saw your comments on the 10 Years talk page, and I thought I'd let you in on a little secret: unsigned. If someone leaves a message on a talk page and doesn't sign it, take down who it was and when they did it from the history page, and stick at the end of their comment, and it will show up like this:  —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Akrabbim (talk • contribs).

Also, if someone edits your message, don't be afraid to use the guidelines on WP:WARN, and contact an admin if needed. This way, you can do these things instead of yelling at them to no avail. So, hope I helped! &mdash;Akrabbimtalk 02:16, 28 July 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Bullet for My Valentine
When you want to add the unsigned template, just add this:

And, btw, I don't have any opinion on Bullet for My Valentine's genre. Funeral 01:37, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

Queens of the Stone Age Taskforce
I'd like to invite you to join the newly-formed taskforce Queens of the Stone Age|Queens of the Stone Age. There's alot of Queens of the Stone Age-related articles on Wikipedia that could use a little attention, and I hope this taskforce can help organize an effort to improve them. So please, take a look and if you like what you see, help us get this taskforce off the ground and a few Queens of the Stone Age pages into the front ranks of Wikipedia articles. Thanks! --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 10:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)