User talk:Itaguy

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Victor 12:17, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Thanks!
...will do my best. ;)
 * Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages. Typing four tildes after your comment ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) will insert a signature showing your username and a date/time stamp, which makes it clear who said what, and when. Thank you. --Victor 12:20, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Let's try.. :) Itaguy 12:21, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Thing is, you should try to keep this thing organized. Indent replies with one more colon than the previous entry. Also, you put your tildes directly in front of the text. You don't put a new line between them. :) --Victor 12:23, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the advice. :)Itaguy 12:28, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Do you use Firefox? There is a Firefox extension that makes Wikipedia editing easier. It helps you with adding formatting tags and other neat things like that. I use it. It's quite nice. It even adds a toolbar to the browser with stuff that you might need, including links to your user page, etc. Try it out. --Victor 12:29, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Actually I use Opera most of the time. Anyway I also have Firefox installed, so I will try it out and see how it goes.--Itaguy 12:35, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Artemisia Gentileschi
Greetings:

I have added some reference sources to the article. Would you think of requesting more peer reviews so that the article can continue to improve? Mabibliophile 15:39, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Hi Itaguy,

Thanks for the translation from the Italian version of Artemisia Gentileschi. I've started to merge the information for the previous English version and make other copyedits. Despite its smaller size, it looks like the English version has some information to offer back to the Italian article. In particular, in relation to the details of the rape trial of 1612.

Thanks again. -- Solipsist 20:35, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * No problem. :) But I think that the part about she being the first female painter of that kind of subjects is wrong, as specified later in the article (The Woman and the painter section). Unfortunately I do not know that much about her so I'm just following what the italian article says about this matter. --Itaguy 21:00, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think you are right. I've seen other comments that there were at least two earlier female Rennaisance painters. -- Solipsist 22:13, 4 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Hi Itaguy,

I too thank you for the translation! I modified a lot of grammar, it was not necessarily incorrect before, I am just trying to improve readability -- I hope you don't mind =). I will finish the rest later.  Italian is next on my list of languages to learn, and man, Artimesia Gentileschi is amazing isn't she?!  Have a nice day!, and thanks for the tilde tilde tilde tilde tip on your talk page -- I didn't know that! dikaiopolis 05:53, 2005 Jun 11 (UTC)
 * Hello! My pleasure. :) Most of the errors were typos. I did the translation in a couple of hours and english is not my first language, so I was sure about the presence of some errors there and there. The good thing about Wikipedia is that someone will correct them, as you did ;) (although the "readability", excluding obvious grammatical errors - is pretty subjective). Thanks for your contribution!--Itaguy 12:22, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Cattiviklogo.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Cattiviklogo.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 18:05, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Cattiviklogo.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Cattiviklogo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:45, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:La7.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:La7.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Nino2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Nino2.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 11:02, 8 May 2008 (UTC)