User talk:Italawar

Anti defection law
Hi I have reverted your article above, back to the redirect. Do not add back in. More than 50% of it is copyright violation and the rest is badly sourced. It can't remain in mainspace as it stands. It also duplicates to a certain extent, content already found on Wikipedia. If you want to try and create an article, for example to extend what is found on Wikipedia regarding Anti defection laws, then please create it in the draft system at WP:AFC where it can be reviewed. Thanks.  scope_creep Talk  19:12, 17 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If you need any help give me a shout.  scope_creep Talk  10:56, 18 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AHINDA
Hello, Italawar

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Winged Blades of Godric and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, AHINDA, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit Edit the page]
 * 2) Remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) Click the  button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&#x222F; WBG converse 06:14, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop
Your writing skills are way too low, as of now and I have to literally revert all of your contributions en masse; you are better-suited to contribute to some sister-Wikipedia in your mother-tongue. &#x222F; WBG converse —Preceding undated comment added 06:22, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Urban Naxals: The Making of Buddha in a Traffic Jam
Hello Italawar. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Urban Naxals: The Making of Buddha in a Traffic Jam, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. Thank you. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 05:49, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

In an edit summary on Urban Naxals: The Making of Buddha in a Traffic Jam you asked, "Is there any way to delete that article?" Are you talking about how to delete Urban Naxals: The Making of Buddha in a Traffic Jam? If so, you will need to explain better why it should be deleted. Unless you have a very compelling reason the answer is probably no, there is no way that it is going to be deleted. Please reply here. ~ GB fan 10:23, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * You are getting very disruptive with this. I have now protected the page so you can not edit it.  You need to start talking.  rather than just asking for it to be deleted.  ~ GB fan 11:13, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Your recent editing history at Vinod Chaubey shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Harshil want to talk? 12:48, 23 December 2019 (UTC)
 * You too, for the same Vinod Chaubey article and other reasons, please do not edit war or post on my talk page. That section and those words were there before my first edit to this article. Those are contributions from other editors and okay because they cover the different sides, meet the NPOV and other core wikipedia community agreed content guidelines. Italawar (talk) 14:05, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Me Too Urban Naxal
Hello Italawar,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Me Too Urban Naxal for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

TomCat4680 (talk) 12:57, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Please go to a talk page
You really need to stop editing articles for a bit and actually talk to someone on a talk page. You can do it here or on one of the article talk pages. ~ GB fan 14:04, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Vidhana Sabha Constituencies of Karnataka
I saw your message in Page Kudachi (Vidhana Sabha constituency) asking "what about other constituencies?". Well I would want to reiterate that every Vidhana Sabha Page from Karnataka should be moved in this manner. According to serial number, I have move first four among them. i.e., Nippani, Chikkodi-Sadalga, Kagwad, Kudachi and also Shivajinagar. In subsequent contributions, will do the same as well for other Constituencies of Karnataka. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vijethnbharadwaj (talk • contribs) 06:49, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
 * Please add new discussions at the bottom of the page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Italawar (talk) 10:18, 13 January 2020 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Citizenship Amendment Act protests
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from online sources. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, most of your additions had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa (talk) 13:26, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

Needs attention: Template:Citizenship Amendment Act protests
How can we have redirects for every state and UT when protests didn't happen everywhere to the extent of having a separate page. Please figure out the way of making the template less confusing and less redirecting for now. Maybe unlink redirects. DTM (talk) 10:03, 27 February 2020 (UTC)


 * there is no need to move the redirects.  ⋙–D Big X ray ᗙ  15:39, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert for India, Pakistan and Afghanistan
Note that North East Delhi riots is one of the many articles covered by these sanctions. Doug Weller talk 16:09, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on North East Delhi riots; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.''The page is on one-revert rule (1RR). Please read the edit notice carefully.'' Kautilya3 (talk) 09:03, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

"Citizenship Amendment Act protests in CAA protests in National Capital Territory of Delhi" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Citizenship Amendment Act protests in CAA protests in National Capital Territory of Delhi. Since you had some involvement with the Citizenship Amendment Act protests in CAA protests in National Capital Territory of Delhi redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 17:11, 16 March 2020 (UTC)

"CAA protests in National Capital Territory of Delhi" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect CAA protests in National Capital Territory of Delhi should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Steel1943 (talk) 17:14, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Godi Media


A tag has been placed on Godi Media requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://clarionindia.net/why-indias-godi-media-spreads-hatred-and-fake-news/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. bonadea contributions talk 13:28, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

The article Godi Media is inappropriate for several reasons – it was in part an attack page (Wikipedia can absolutely not point the finger at individuals and make derogatory comments about them) and there is almost no context to explain to the reader what it is even about. There is a draft page at Draft:Godi Media which you can work on, but do not move it into article space yourself. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 13:51, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Draft:Godi Media, you may be blocked from editing. ''

This is the exact same content that was deleted before, so you already knew it was unacceptable. bonadea'' contributions talk 14:27, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Warning
Italawar, edits such as this one are absolutely unacceptable in an area under discretionary sanctions. You need to adhere strictly to WP:RS and WP:NOR; further edits that violate these guidelines may be grounds for a topic ban, or other sanction. Vanamonde (Talk) 14:45, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , Don't assume that an edit summary can constitute "discussion". Italawar (talk) 07:50, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:55, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 15:59, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for persistent personal attacks and editing contrary to the policy on neutral point of view. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

AE
I have initiated a discussion at AE about your recent edits. The discussion may be found here. Vanamonde (Talk) 01:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 15:15, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

Block evasion
I see you have evaded your block by posting as an IP. Of course that is not allowed, or blocks would be pointless. You, the person — the individual — are blocked, not merely this account. Don't evade the block again. Bishonen &#124; tålk 14:52, 22 July 2020 (UTC).

Why Block
I think the reason behind my block is not Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines, Can you justify your action? Italawar (talk) 14:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Proxying
Italawar seems to be trying to edit by proxy, and as such a warning about that, or revoking talk page access, may be in order. Vanamonde (Talk) 22:46, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Oh seriously. First block evasion with an IP and now this. I will revoke talkpage access. Thanks, and . Bishonen &#124; tålk 08:30, 6 October 2020 (UTC).

Proposed deletion of AHINDA


The article AHINDA has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable. No significant coverage."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. BhaskaraPattelar (talk) 14:41, 22 July 2020 (UTC)


 * , Could you explain to me how to edit talk pages of AHINDA?
 * You are blocked. You are not supposed to edit any page except this one, for the purpose of requesting unblock. You have done that once, above, but it wasn't a good request and it was declined. I suggest you post another, and this time do read WP:Guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen &#124; tålk 11:08, 26 July 2020 (UTC).
 * Thanks for objecting to the proposed deletion of AHINDA Italawar (talk)`

Deletion discussion about Parasgad (Vidhana Sabha constituency)
Hello, Italawar, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username North8000, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Parasgad (Vidhana Sabha constituency), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Parasgad (Vidhana Sabha constituency).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:03, 26 July 2020 (UTC)


 * , please don't send these messages to indefinitely blocked users. In this case, it certainly won't help the user's misconceptions about what it means to be blocked, see above. Bishonen &#124; tålk 11:12, 26 July 2020 (UTC).
 * Thanks for the note. The page curation bot did it automatically when I AFd'd the article, but the listing does show when the creator is currently blocked so I could know and then delete those posts on their talk page. North8000 (talk) 16:32, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
 * You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/India-related articles. 171.48.31.3 (talk) 07:54, 29 July 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Bishonen &#124; tålk 08:32, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Operation Kamala for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Operation Kamala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Operation Kamala until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 11:16, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Draft:Godi Media
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Draft:Godi Media&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. 122.179.109.33 (talk) 14:43, 23 February 2021 (UTC)