User talk:Italianstud-lina2

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Luigi Ugolini. M.bw.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Luigi Ugolini. M.bw.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 04:53, 9 March 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 04:53, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Luigi Ugolini. writer.poet..jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Luigi Ugolini. writer.poet..jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation.  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 01:25, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Pietro.Annigoni.stamp.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pietro.Annigoni.stamp.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:10, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Please be careful
On Vanna Bonta's article when you changed the template please ensure you move all the information over to it. Gioto (talk) 06:53, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

AfD on a page you have previously edited or commented on a previous Afd
You are invited to join the discussion at Articles for deletion/Quantum fiction (2nd nomination).  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:20, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Grazie. I am not expert in this subject but know the citations and references are many, even in Panorama Magazine (Mondadori) there is an article about the quantum fiction genre. I am sorry I missed this discussion! But it is good to see that intelligent people can see and the article is there. Italianstud-lina2 (talk) 20:51, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Flags
Hi, thanks for your contributions. We do not use flags in infoboxes. Please see MOS:FLAG. Thanks Span (talk) 21:07, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)