User talk:Itisfunny

not that we know what it is no, maybe you would like to tell me what it is...

Proposed deletion of Ways to quit smoking
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ways to quit smoking, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Personal testimony.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 17:34, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ways to quit smoking
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 17:39, 4 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Hello Itisfunny,
 * I have redirected this page to Smoking_cessation. Please read WP:NOTHOWTO, WP:OR for what content is and what isn't acceptable. Essay-like articles and How-TOs are usually not suitable for an encyclopedia. --59.95.108.155 (talk) 18:00, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
 * These edits were wrong in two respects: a) you deleted all the existing content of the page - that is vandalism and b) you used abusive language. Any more similar behaviour and you will find yourself blocked. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 18:13, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Reply
I propose that if you do not like someones article that you ignore it... seems like some people would rather be a contributor to the problem rather then a solution... they see someones article and resent the truth it conveys or take offense to the fact that it might be successful so they propose it be deleted by some poppy cock explanation rather than mind their own business... I would be willing to bet that the ones that have been proposing my article be deleted are smokers who do not want to quit so they do this to get back at anyone trying to help others that might get some enlightenment from the article or the inspiration they need to help them quit but due to a few rotten apples whose intent is to delete the article before anyone that may enjoy reading it ever gets a chance... why have the option to create articles on wikipedia in the first place if all it takes is one or to ass holes who have nothing better to do then delete or propose deleting rather then offering to help edit? I thought the the whole idea was to post an article so others could edit it not destroy it or try to get it deleted... seems these people have a vendetta to go around attacking the so called freedom of the press being offered whenever they think the article is self serving... It is their ignorance that drives them into wanting to undermine anyone who is attempting to open the eyes of others in an effort to enlighten then as to all the "bull shit" going on in the world that will only end when enough people start becoming a solution to the problem rather then a contributor to the problem. problem being that they seem to think that any information that does not meet their criteria as being good enough to be included in an encyclopedia can not be improved to the point to where in it is... as that would require editing help rather then undermining attacks.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Itisfunny (talk • contribs)
 * You even vandalise your own talk page. We do not replace content, we add. And we sign our entries. For the record I quit smoking a few years ago with the help of sub-lingual tablets. &mdash; RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 13:20, 5 July 2009 (UTC)