User talk:Itrinks

Speedy deletion nomination of Stonehenge Hidden Landscape Project


A tag has been placed on Stonehenge Hidden Landscape Project requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://lbi-archpro.org/cs/stonehenge/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sjö (talk) 10:51, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Permission
Hi! Regarding your question at Talk:Stonehenge Hidden Landscape Project. I'm not an expert but as I understand it there are two ways to go. You can rephrase the information (being caruful to avoid paraprasing too closely) or you can release the text under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.

You can release it by adding a text to the project's website, e.g. "This text is released under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License" and link to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/. You can also go to Declaration of consent for all enquiries and follow the instructions there.

FAQ/Copyright has the answers to the most common questions about copyright and links to other relevant pages, for more in-depth information.

Don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page if there's anything else I can help you with.Sjö (talk) 12:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)