User talk:Itrytohelp32

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CptViraj was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Itrytohelp32/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Itrytohelp32/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Itrytohelp32/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CptViraj&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Itrytohelp32/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CptViraj (📧) 10:40, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Red links
Hello and thank you for your edits. Wikipedia certainly has a lot of red links to articles which should never be written, and it can be helpful to unlink them. In case you've not seen it, WP:REDDEAL has some good advice on when to remove red links and when to leave them in place ready for the target article to appear. You may also be interested in WikiProject Red Link Recovery. That project is barely active but its page and talk page have some useful tips and links. Happy editing, Certes (talk) 11:26, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

@Certes: Thank you for your input! I was somewhat familiar with WP:REDDEAL, but I hadn't heard of the project. I'll take a look at it! I'm always happy to improve my editing by whatever means. Thank you for the links! Regards  Itrytohelp 32  (talk) 20:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

List of cities with the most skyscrapers - undone edits
I noticed that you removed Metro Vancouver and Paris Courbevoie from List of cities with the most skyscrapers because they are not cities proper. Unfortunately, Metro Manila is not a city proper either, yet it has been on the page for a long time and still is. I would like to inquire if you will be removing that as well for consistency? On an aside, two out of two people on the talk page agreed that metropolitan areas should be included. Zacharycmango (talk) 22:42, 20 November 2020 (UTC)


 * @Zacharycmango Yes, you absolutely raise a good point. It is my opinion that Manila should be removed for consistency, but a discussion about it is certainly worth having- considering multiple editors think that they should be included. I suggest we open a proper discussion about it on the talk page. I've reverted my two edits until a consensus can be reached.  Itrytohelp 32  (talk) 01:26, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Adding your own images to articles and consideration of quality
Thanks for adding images to Wikipedia articles! It looks like some of the replacements you've done added your image when it was clearly not higher quality. This seemed especially true at Hudson Yards (development), where most recently you replaced this image with this one. The highest quality photo with the greatest encyclopedic value should be the lead (first) image, although sometimes there are opportunities to add images further down the article. So like this one that you added to Central Park Tower probably isn't the best quality (the light, taken through glass with a panel visible, along with your reflection, a light, etc.) but is a different perspective than we have otherwise, so maybe add it further down the page? Just a thought. Some advice I'd give, as someone who uploads lots of photos, is to be really careful that you're not adding yours just because they're yours. If people think you're doing that -- and especially if you're restoring them after someone challenges it (see WP:EW and WP:BRD for standard editing norms), that can eventually lead to restrictions, etc. (not a threat, to be clear -- just advice). &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 02:53, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * @&mdash; Rhododendrites  talk The Central Park Tower image you mentioned isn't current. Also, please assume good faith- I'm not trying to upload photos to leads just because they're mine. I simply have newer images and am trying to add newer images. Also, I never reverted anyone's changes. I was changing the image every time to try to put forth the best one possible. I don't appreciate you assuming that my edits are in bad faith. Also, about your not threat. I never restored the same image. Just trying to add a better one.  I'm trying to make Wikipedia a better place. Good Day  Itrytohelp 32  (talk) 03:07, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. It just seems hard to understand what benefit this image has over this one. But perhaps I just don't see it or understand, in which case sorry for coming to the conclusion it was motivated by it being your own. Let me reframe my unsolicited advice, then: when other people might not understand or might disagree with your choice of image, it helps to explain why (beyond it being newer, usually speaking to angles, amount of subject shown, quality of the image, etc.) on the talk page. FWIW. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 03:32, 10 January 2021 (UTC)


 * @&mdash; Rhododendrites  talk I agree with the idea that your image is a better image aesthetically. However, it is my subjective opinion- that being a large construction project currently changing everyday- the date the image was taken should be considered to be more relevant- as it should more accurately represents the subject of the photo as long as it isn't completely appalling. However, if you believe that my image is too poor of a quality to be considered- then by all means, revert it to your revision. Happy Editing  Itrytohelp 32  (talk) 03:46, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

Fatemeh Karizi moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Fatemeh Karizi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). Notability is in question. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. DMySon (talk) 05:35, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
 * @DMySon, Thank you for the movement to drafts rather that suggesting the article for deletion. It's been quite a while since I last edited and suppose I'm pretty darn rusty. Regardless, you handled my poorly-written article professionally and I appreciate your assistance. Happy Editing and Merry Christmas.  Itrytohelp 32  (talk) 19:08, 26 December 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Fatemeh Karizi
Hello, Itrytohelp32. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Fatemeh Karizi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 06:02, 28 May 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Fatemeh Karizi


Hello, Itrytohelp32. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Fatemeh Karizi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 05:40, 26 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)