User talk:ItsMario97

Stop removing accurate and proper content
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shakira: Bzrp Music Sessions, Vol. 53, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. 181.235.77.1 (talk) 12:54, 13 May 2023 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 181.235.74.185 (talk)

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, ItsMario97, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to Colores seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Dl2000 (talk) 01:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of El Polimata for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article El Polimata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/El Polimata until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 19:37, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Nice Messi Photo
I bet you someone is going to nominate you for a ban. I don't agree with it, but I know it's going to happen. I'm placing my bet and prediction in advance. Fephisto (talk) 16:42, 17 October 2022 (UTC)


 * What's wrong with using that photo? Am I breaking a rule? If I'm doing it please tell me and I'll remove it. ItsMario97 (talk) 23:16, 17 October 2022 (UTC)
 * No issue with me, I'm just a fan of Messi too. Fephisto (talk) 16:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * OK, but why do you think they're going to ban me? ItsMario97 (talk) 22:38, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh, because of the Javier Milei edits. I've seen quite a few people get banned for editing that article.  Fephisto (talk) 13:02, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Thanks
Hi Mario. Thanks for reverting this IP editor on Un Verano Sin Ti. They've been unable to accept MOS:THEBAND for months and have waited for multiple pages to be unprotected just so they can restore a capital T and have another edit summary rant about somebody being racist for not capitalising it. They're definitely obsessed so anybody else stepping in is great.  Ss  112   10:27, 23 December 2022 (UTC)

Why have you undone my edit?
I saw you undid my edit of Sony Music. You changed the Infobox title from "Sony Music Holdings Inc" to "Sony Music Entertainment". Do you not know the Infobox title for record labels is supposed to be their legal name, did you not know Sony Music Holdings Inc is Sony Music's legal name so you undid my edit due to your lack of knowledge? Which ever the case may be I will be changing it back. 2603:6000:F200:2A81:A4FE:C400:5033:C27A (talk) 00:04, 4 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Hello, I think you are not well informed, the legal name is Sony Music Entertainment. See https://icis.corp.delaware.gov/eCorp/EntitySearch/NameSearch.aspx ItsMario97 (talk) 00:07, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * If you look closely, that is also the company where the vast majority of registered trademarks are. ItsMario97 (talk) 00:11, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * No, because as seen in old versions of Sony Music it shows the legal name as Sony Music Entertainment Inc. and Sony Music Holdings Inc.'s old name is Sony Music Entertainment Inc. https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_il/CORP_56017119. I will be changing it back to Sony Music Holdings Inc. and it will not be changed for as long as I am on Wikipedia I hope. 2603:6000:F200:2A81:A4FE:C400:5033:C27A (talk) 01:13, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * First, your sentence "and it will not be changed for as long as I am on Wikipedia I hope" It's not the right way to discuss things.
 * Well, if you want to talk about OpenCorporates, we talk about OpenCorporates, this is the real company, look at all the trademarks out there, and Sony always names "Sony Music Entertainment". Regards. https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_de/3824209 ItsMario97 (talk) 01:17, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * To continue my last reply Sony Music Holdings Inc. is their legal name since Sony Music Entertainment Inc. is their former name and Sony Music Entertainment Inc. used to be all over Sony's cassettes and CDs before Sony BMG. 2603:6000:F200:2A81:A4FE:C400:5033:C27A (talk) 01:18, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Please read all my messages and do not impose your decision. I don't want to get into an editing conflict. ItsMario97 (talk) 01:20, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Just asking, so your saying Sony Music Holdings Inc. is a knockoff company? Cause if not then why would both Sony Music Entertainment (with no LLC, Inc, Corp, Ltd, etc, which is odd) and Sony Music Holdings Inc. exist? 2603:6000:F200:2A81:A4FE:C400:5033:C27A (talk) 01:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * You're saying things I didn't say. ItsMario97 (talk) 01:22, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Just asking you a question, why do both Sony Music Holdings Inc. and Sony Music Entertainment coexist? 2603:6000:F200:2A81:A4FE:C400:5033:C27A (talk) 01:23, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * That a company does not say "Inc.", "LLC" or similar things is not strange, I invite you to review each of Sony's publications and there you see that it says "Sony Music Entertainment", apart from the company that I spent the link you can see all the trademarks there which means it is the main company.
 * Look at OpenCorporates and there are thousands of companies owned by Sony with the word "Sony Music". ItsMario97 (talk) 01:26, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Look at the previous names of this https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_ny/1218162 and then look at any Sony Music release from before the year 2003 by a U.S. artist. 2603:6000:F200:2A81:A4FE:C400:5033:C27A (talk) 01:28, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * If you dont have any Sony Music releases from before 2003 use this image as a reference (Look at the P-line or C-Line) 2603:6000:F200:2A81:A4FE:C400:5033:C27A (talk) 01:31, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * You are linking to a branch, not even the main one.
 * You are already in an editing conflict, please stop.
 * The article should talk about the CURRENT MAIN company, which is mentioned on the Sony sites and is "Sony Music Entertainment".
 * What happened happened.
 * https://icis.corp.delaware.gov/eCorp/EntitySearch/NameSearch.aspx
 * https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_il/CORP_56017119 ItsMario97 (talk) 01:40, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * By "branch" I mean that the OpenCorporates link you sent me is a branch of https://opencorporates.com/companies/us_de/2142168 ItsMario97 (talk) 01:43, 4 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Do you know what your talking about? 2603:6000:F200:2A81:78C3:E792:5DFD:6713 (talk) 16:39, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Can you help me work on this article?
I have created a new article of a new song by Shakira and Manuel Turizo called "Copa Vacía" and I will also be working on my article but I am also looking for the help of someone in case they want to help me, I don't know if you want to help me in the article. If you do, then thank you. A cordial greeting and good luck in your editions! Saúl Rodrigo Martínez (talk) 21:02, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion contested: Copa Vacía
Hello ItsMario97. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Copa Vacía, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: A9 can only be used if the artist of the music in question doesn't have their own page. Thank you. BangJan1999 23:42, 20 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry, can you pass me the indicated template please, I'm not very expert. ItsMario97 (talk) 23:43, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * WP:A9 Here's the link to a description of the criteria in question. Let me know if you have further questions. BangJan1999 23:46, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I think I've got it right now, is it set right? ItsMario97 (talk) 23:49, 20 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I think I got it right, can you check? Articles for deletion/Copa Vacía ItsMario97 (talk) 23:51, 20 March 2023 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, I'm 181.235.77.1. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Te Felicito (Shakira and Rauw Alejandro song) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. 181.235.77.1 (talk) 16:25, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Please stop adding a fan made cover art
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Medicine (Shakira song). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 181.235.77.1 (talk) 16:31, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

You removed accurate and proper content once again
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Did It Again (Shakira song), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. 181.235.77.1 (talk) 16:36, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

@ItsMario97 Hi, I am Minecraft survival s. I know you have deleted my edit, why did you delete my comments?
@ItsMario97 Hi, I am Minecraft survival s, why did you delete my edition of mikecrack https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mikecrack&oldid=1154226135? YOU MUST GIVE ME MY EDITION OF MIKECRACK BACK! MY EDITION HAD A SPANISH VERSION OF MIKECRACK SO USERS WHO SPEAK THAT LANGUAGE CAN READ ALL THAT IN SPANISH!

How can an edition or revision be restored?
How can you restore a revision for example ~  Alex |  Leave me a message on my talk page!  22:01, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

(personal attack removed)
2603:8081:A200:1D94:5DCF:FF88:6E49:F69B (talk) 19:59, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Rules are rules, I didn't create them, but you have to follow them even if you don't like them. See MOS:THEBAND. ItsMario97 (talk) 20:12, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Disruptive IP editor
Mario, you shouldn't have to deal with comments like the above. Next time it happens, report them to an administrator. That's a blatantly xenophobic personal attack. Also, you should have requested page protection of Un Verano Sin Ti and any other pages they're being disruptive on, rather than reverting for the past month. I've requested page protection.  Ss  112   05:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks. ItsMario97 (talk) 05:44, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Also, you might want to have your edit notice page (User talk:ItsMario97/Editnotice) deleted, using Template:Db-g7. By having created your edit notice as a redirect to your talk page, it's showing the content of everybody's messages as an edit notice to anybody who edits your talk page before the actual editing window is shown.  Ss  112   05:47, 21 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Initially I got this issue temporarily dealt with by getting two of the involved IP address ranges (2607:FB91:1200:0:0:0:0:0/40 and 2603:8081:A200:1D94:0:0:0:0/64) blocked from editing for a few days, it's a damn shame the page has to be semi-protected locking out innocent anonymous and new editors for a year because this person wanted to blatantly and repeatedly break Manual of Style guidelines and edit war against it instead of getting consensus for it. I would've asked for a very long partial block of the IP ranges involved from the affected articles. Oh well. — AP 499D25  (talk)  03:07, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

The Band edit warring
Hi ItsMario97!

I've started a discussion about "the Marias" capitalisation dispute over at Talk:The Marías § Capitalisation of 'the Marias'.

Maybe you're aware of this, but Wikipedia has a policy against edit warring, which states that editors must not revert each other's edits, even if the edits are justifiable / are "right" according to some guideline. There are some exceptions to the edit warring policy like obvious vandalism, WP:BLP violations and blatant spam, but editing in favour of the MOS:THEBAND guideline does not fit in any of those exceptions.

While the other party definitely needs to be aware of the edit warring policy, let alone the Manual of Style guideline, you can also be at fault too if you keep edit warring without opening a discussion or finding some remedy to the dispute (such as a dispute resolution option), please keep that in mind. I've seen numerous edit wars in the past where both editors in the dispute got blocked from editing because of this, even though the other editor seemed to be more legitimate and knowledgeable in the matter. So I'd like you to join the talk page discussion linked above, and avoid frequently reverting the IP editor's edits. If they fail to discuss but keep reverting, then that's when actions shall be taken against them, again. — AP 499D25  (talk)  11:33, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)