User talk:ItsMeYoshi

August 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Shinji Kagawa has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:03, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Shinji Kagawa was changed by ItsMeYoshi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.956575 on 2016-08-15T01:03:08+00:00.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Peter Schmeichel. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Peter Schmeichel was changed by ItsMeYoshi (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.863276 on 2016-08-15T03:20:22+00:00.

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Peter Schmeichel, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Dane 2007  talk 03:23, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Neil N  talk to me 03:33, 15 August 2016 (UTC)