User talk:Itsablaupunkt

Your submission at Articles for creation: Per Capita Australia (March 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by The Herald were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Per Capita Australia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Per_Capita_Australia Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Herald&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Per_Capita_Australia reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 07:17, 19 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Could you please explain how it "reads an essay" or not in a "neutral point of view" so I can adjust the submission? Itsablaupunkt (talk) 12:01, 19 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Have a look at other articles to see how an article is structured. Go through thr links provided to understand the Manual of style and how to fix the errors in the article. Thanks. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:07, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the links! I had a good look at them but I am still a bit confused. I modeled the submission on this page here as they are similar organisations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Australia_Institute#cite_note-30
 * Are the two submission not similar?
 * I'll change the style for the names of the publications to better suit the Wikipedia style guide. Itsablaupunkt (talk) 12:31, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you can use that as a template. The Herald (Benison) (talk) 12:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Great! It's what I used when I started putting this page together.
 * I'll make some further adjustments then.
 * Thanks Itsablaupunkt (talk) 13:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Per Capita Australia
Hello Itsablaupunkt, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Per Capita Australia, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Per Capita Australia.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

C F A  💬  16:46, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
Hello Itsablaupunkt. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Per Capita Australia, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Itsablaupunkt. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. C F A  💬  16:52, 5 July 2024 (UTC)