User talk:Itspspss

September 2020
Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Trae Coyle article, and I couldn't find one either. If you have a reliable source please let me know and we can change the article. Please let me know if you have any questions. GiantSnowman 18:55, 9 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Trae Coyle, you may be blocked from editing. GiantSnowman 17:59, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Songchai Thongcham


The article Songchai Thongcham has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Captain Calm (talk) 07:33, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020
Hello. You recently removed a Biographies of Living Persons PROD, from Songchai Thongcham, without adding a reliable source. Please don't remove these Biographies of Living Persons PRODs from articles unless they contain at least one reliable source. If this was a mistake, don't worry, it has been replaced. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider adding reliable sources to the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Captain Calm (talk) 07:38, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Harry Clarke (footballer, born 2001), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GiantSnowman 08:54, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lloyd Kelly, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:39, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Natpisit Chompoonuch for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Natpisit Chompoonuch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Natpisit Chompoonuch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. John B123 (talk) 14:44, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 AFC Asian Cup squads. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Nehme1499 (talk) 15:04, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at 2019 AFC Asian Cup squads, you may be blocked from editing. Nehme1499 (talk) 09:57, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Maximilian Steinbauer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maximilian Steinbauer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Maximilian Steinbauer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 20:16, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Pongsakorn Trisat


The article Pongsakorn Trisat has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NFOOTBALL and WP:GNG currently. Hasn't yet played a game of professional football and coverage is not focused on him enough to be considered significant."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone 20:40, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Chakkit Laptrakul. Dl2000 (talk) 21:46, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Korrakot Pipatnadda


The article Korrakot Pipatnadda has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NFOOTY."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 00:26, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Khanin Tecksa-Nguan


The article Khanin Tecksa-Nguan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NFOOTY."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 04:57, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Thanakij Khanakai


The article Thanakij Khanakai has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NFOOTY."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JTtheOG (talk) 04:58, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Korrakot Pipatnadda for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Korrakot Pipatnadda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Korrakot Pipatnadda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Nehme1499 (<b style="font-size:80%;color:#a9a9a9">talk</b>) 19:02, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Salva Valero for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Salva Valero is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Salva Valero until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chonnapat Buaphan


A tag has been placed on Chonnapat Buaphan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Articles for deletion/Chonnaphat Buaphan. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 12:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Sasalak Haiprakhon, you may be blocked from editing. Dl2000 (talk) 20:05, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Anthonio Sanjairag for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anthonio Sanjairag is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Anthonio Sanjairag until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Govvy (talk) 18:42, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Teerasak Poeiphimai


The article Teerasak Poeiphimai has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY as they haven't played in a professional league."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HawkAussie (talk) 11:27, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Teerasak Poeiphimai


The article Teerasak Poeiphimai has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "At best, WP:TOOSOON"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:00, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Jonathan Khemdee for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jonathan Khemdee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jonathan Khemdee until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. JW 1961 Talk 14:27, 26 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Nomination for deletion withdrawn JW 1961 Talk 17:41, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Teerasak Poeiphimai
Hello, Itspspss

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Teerasak Poeiphimai, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit Edit the page]
 * 2) Remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) Click the  button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And remember to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 Talk 08:56, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kiadtiphon Udom
Hello, Itspspss

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Kiadtiphon Udom, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit Edit the page]
 * 2) Remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) Click the  button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And remember to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

JW 1961 Talk 08:46, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Chonnapat Buaphan
Hello, Itspspss,

Thank you for creating Chonnapat Buaphan.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"What is needed are references from significant coverage about this player, and not their own words; in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. Lists, Team rosters, pages listing matches and results, databases, Instagram, Soccerway, Facebook, none of these are reliable sources. (There have been changes to the notability guide for sports - see WP:NSPORT ) You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally giving more information about this player, that meet these criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that this article is not suitable for inclusion"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 02:18, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Timestamps and dates on footballers' pages
Stop deleting the timestamp at the bottom of the infobox of footballers' pages. This only serves to confuse other editors and goes against WP:FOOTY standards. Anwegmann (talk) 01:12, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

This is your second warning to stop deleting the timestamps at the bottom of players' infoboxes, as you have done most recently at Chonnapat Buaphan, among many, many others. Again, this goes against obvious and important WP:FOOTY standards, and it causes confusion and frustration for all other editors. If you continue to ignore these warnings and go against editing standards, I will have no other choice but to report you for vandalism and disruptive editing, putting you at risk of being blocked from editing. Anwegmann (talk) 20:18, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)