User talk:ItzElizzzzz

March 2021
Your recent editing history at Liza on Demand shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.''You also are edit warring on Justice League (film) and I ask that you stop. Thank you.'' Sennecaster (talk) 16:19, 17 March 2021 (UTC)


 * I apologize. You are not edit warring on Liza on Demand, but you still have reverted multiple eidts on Justice League (film). Again, my bad for accusing you of edit warring on the wrong page. Sennecaster (talk) 16:20, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I'm RacoonyRE. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Liza on Demand—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. RacoonyRE (talk) 20:17, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Liza on Demand. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. RacoonyRE (talk) 20:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Notebook, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: The Notebook was changed by ItzElizzzzz (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87342 on 2021-03-17T21:06:04+00:00 Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:06, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Kinu t/c 21:08, 17 March 2021 (UTC)