User talk:Itzhak Fouxon

Reply
Hi, thanks for message. This page was one of the worse I've seen on Wikipedia, breaking almost every rule. I deleted the article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. This article had only one reference, which was to the organisation itself, clearly not an independent source. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
 * There was no evidence of notability. The text was purely promoting what the organisation claims to do. To show notability you need hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, funding or expenditure.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.
 * It had a whole section called "The support of the global community" which consisted entirely of unsourced and cherry-picked quotes saying how wonderful the organisation is. It's supposed to be an encyclopaedia article not a fan page.
 * Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: brings together Jewish families and restores family relations in the whole world... more than 7 000 people from all over the world registered there... information about more than 110 000 Jews... significantly influence the Jewish self-identification... supported by numerous scientific and cultural figures.


 * the article was a copyright violation of the organisation's website. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created an organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. The copied site was marked ©2015, Am ha-Zikaron Institute. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial but there is no indication that the copied site allows free use. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.
 * The author had edited no other article and clearly had a conflict of interest when editing this article, which should have been declared.
 * An editor working working directly or indirectly for the organisation, or otherwise are acting on its behalf, is very strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, if an editor is paid directly or indirectly by the organisation they are writing about, they are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose their employer, client and affiliation. They can post such a mandatory disclosure to their user page at, using your account as an example, User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:    . Note that editing with a COI is discouraged, but permitted as long as it is declared. Concealing a COI can lead to a block.

If you are thinking about recreating this article, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read this important guidance.

''we cannot see where the problem is. We would appreciate your help''. If you have a a conflict of interest and decide to write about this topic, you must declare your COI as indicated above. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  06:53, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Am haZikaron
Hello, Itzhak Fouxon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Am haZikaron, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 1 June 2021 (UTC)