User talk:Iulianu

Hello and Welcome! I hope you like the place. --mav

Bun&#259;, nu te-ar interesa s&#259; colaborezi la Wikipedia în român&#259;? --Danutz

Bun articolul despre Leu, bravo! Masi27185 16:43, 30 May 2004 (UTC)

De ce ai mutat articolele despre alegerile din România de la "election" la "elections" ? În englez&#259; se folose&#351;te singularul în acest caz. Vezi U.S. presidential election%2C 2004 de exemplu. Bogdan | Talk 13:13, 24 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Election results
Could you possibly add the number and percentage of seats to Chamber of Deputies of Romania and Senate of Romania? I've added a commented-out table to both to put the data into. -- ChrisO 09:52, 2 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Băsescu
Thank you for your " sailor " edit. I agree; I said roughly this several months ago at Talk:Traian_B%C4%83sescu.

By the way, the top of this user talk page says "I am on Wikibreak until 30 June". Does that mean you are basically on break from this for the next 9 months, or is that an outdated note? -- Jmabel | Talk 02:01, 4 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Oops, thanks for the notice. It was actually 30 June 2005 :-) IulianU 09:08, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

User Categorisation
You were listed on the Wikipedians/Europe page as living in or being associated with Europe. As part of the User categorisation project, these lists are being replaced with user categories. If you would like to add yourself to the category that is replacing the page, please visit Category:Wikipedians in Europe for instructions.--Rmky87 04:07, 12 October 2005 (UTC)

Compromis despre Iasi
Putem spune ca Iasi a fost capitala principatelor Moldovei si Munteniei? Iar ai poze cu Palatul Unirii? --Anittas 18:47, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Care oras a fost capitala principatelor intre anii 1859-1862? Faptul ca scrie acest lucru pe pagina oficiala a Iasului dovedeste ca nu e o minciuna. --Anittas 19:09, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Bine, deci de facto, si Iasi si Bucuresti au fost centre de administratie - adica capitale, intre 1859-1862. Putem scri asta? --Anittas 19:24, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Am scris. Vezi daca mai trebuie ceva. Incu un lucru: pe Wiki, in acest articol, scria o data ca Iasi trebuia compensat de Bucuresti pentru pierderea lui de status de capitala. Stii ceva despre asta? --Anittas 19:36, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Pai eu am citit asta pe Wiki. Inainte nu stiam de aceasta despagubire si nu sunt sigur daca a fost adevarat. De asta te-am intrebat pe tine. --Anittas 20:53, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

Sailor
According to the definition of sailor, Băsescu was one:
 * A sailor is a member of the crew of a ship or boat. The term may comprise anyone from an admiral in the navy to a person who goes out yachting at weekends as a hobby.

bogdan | Talk 13:39, 30 October 2005 (UTC)

Thank you very much...
... for the translation help on my user talk page. I don't think I could have worked some of that out. It's interesting: I can usually read the newspapers (as you can see, I had no trouble at all with [Talk:Romania#One_million_romanians_in_Italy an Ev. Z. article] he recently pasted into a talk page), or 'Dilema', or 'Observatur Cultural', or most Romanian Wikipedia articles, but I often can't read more casual off-the-cuff writing like this. Y'know, my user page only claims "ro-2"... -- Jmabel | Talk 02:51, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

RfC for 86.105.71.34
Hi. I've approved the Rfc for User:86.105.71.34. The extent to which he has made false edits, especially relating to statistics, is quite amazing, spanning everything from mobile phone data to GDP per capita! That is what particularly annoys me - the falsification of numerical data, because numerical data can either be right or wrong. Other changes are more subtle and open to interpretation, but stating things like Romania has 13 million mobile phone users is clearly a lie! Ronline 07:51, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

Iulian, could you weigh in at Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_comment/86.105.71.34? -- Jmabel | Talk 18:41, 5 November 2005 (UTC)

If you are willing to translate his remarks at User_talk:Jmabel, I'd welcome it. As I've said, for me, translating colloquial Romanian is pretty laborious. I believe I understand most of what he said, including a mocking echo of something I said about him having potential to be a good contributor, but I'm not putting any further large amounts of time to him unless and until he is willing to engage in the dispute resolution process. -- Jmabel | Talk 20:06, 6 November 2005 (UTC)

Teoria Roesleriana
Am vazut ca ai pus inapoi niste text pe care l-am sters in articolul Romanian Language. Am pus un comment sa vezi ce aveam de gand. Cred ca e confuzie cu teoria lui R. Roesler si ca e o referire formulata gresit. Nu crezi ca ar trebui sters? Daca chiar se refera la teoria imigrationista, nu are ce cauta acolo. --Rares 03:00, 20 November 2005 (UTC)

=Ronline for Admin=

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Ronline and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship#Ronline. I have nominated Ronline to be Administrator for English Wikipedia. Let's vote for him! Bonaparte  talk  &  contribs

Our forum
Welcome to the Romanian Wikipedia notice board! This page is a portal for all Romanian-related topics and a place for Romanian editors to gather and socialize and debate. Discussions are encouraged, in both English and Romanian. Post any inquiry under their relevant cathegory.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedian%27s_notice_board

--Anittas 17:49, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

Hungarian town names
Please have a look at whenever you will be back. We are still undecided, and maybe your reasoning for removing Hungarian names from Romanian towns pages will gain support.

Translation
Képzelj el egy olyan világot, ahol mindenki szabadon hozzáférhet az emberiség egyetemes tudásának összességéhez. Mi ezen dolgozunk. És szükségünk van a segítségedre. Wikipédia magyarul

-nagytibi ! ? 00:34, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Meetup/Birmingham
This is just a reminder that the Birmingham meetup of UK Wikipedians that you have expressed an interst in is happening tomorrow. Sorry for the short notice. Thryduulf 15:22, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Romanians
Salut. Te-am contactat pt avem serioase probleme la articolul wikipedian despre Romanians. Dupa cum vezi, user-ii Jayig si administratorul SlimVirgin au pus cele mai joase cifre posibile. Cand am incercat sa intervin, punand numerele adevarate, am fost blocat pt "vanadalism", asa trebuie ca toti wikipedistii Romani sa facem ceva. Daca te intereseaza si vrei sa te alaturi, da-mi un email sau scrie pe pagina talk Romanians. Numai bine, NorbertArthur 2 Aprilie 2006

Wikimedia Romania
Hi lulianu, My name is Nathan Carter and I am a member of the Wikimedia Foundation's Chapter's Committee. We are presently in the process of verifying the details of proposed chapter's contact people and checking on the status of each proposal, you are listed as the contact for Wikimedia Romania. If you could contact me either on meta or via e-mail (cartmanau-at-gmail.com) and let me know if you are still the contact person for the chapter and provide a quick run down on where you guys are at it would be greatly appreciated. Cheers --Cartman02au 23:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Iulianu! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Marian Petre Miluţ -
 * 2) Bogdan Olteanu -

WikiProject Romania
--Codrin.B (talk) 04:19, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of StarTeam for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article StarTeam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/StarTeam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mdann52 (talk) 18:43, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Erasmus Bridge Rotterdam.JPG


A tag has been placed on File:Erasmus Bridge Rotterdam.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:06, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:RON-100ronav.jpg


The file File:RON-100ronav.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned image. A higher resolution, non-watermarked image is already hosted on Commons File:100 lei. Romania, 2005 a.jpg"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ★ Bigr   Tex  20:59, 8 July 2019 (UTC)