User talk:Iunaw/Archive1

your reply welcome
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Gumstix, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. You are removing content and replacing it with incorrect/incomplete information deliberately, ignoring comments on the talk page. Please stop the vandalism now.

Cool down.

The information that is there now is both factual and informative.

Please stop trying to "color" your obvious negative opinions of Gumstix Inc. with your attempted edits.

There is nothing there now, that I think we can both agree, is ether inaccuracte or wrong.

I am not affiliated or associated with Gumstix Inc., just a common user trying to looking after the best interest of the community.

You must have had a bad experiance somewhere along the line and for that I am truly sorry.

Having been a victim of the "flameing" wars myself I know what its like.

Changing a product description page with consumer commentary is not the right answer. If you have a beef, take your product complaint to some agency equipted to handle it, like the Better Buisness Bureau.

Wikipedia is neather a consumer advocacy group or an open fourm for opinionated commentary, I'll go to FOX News for that.

Please explane to me how adding Windows CE information can be construded as vandalism?

I have escalated the dispute to the resolution board.

Please stop further main page edits till its resolved.

I look forward to your reply as I am perfectally willing to carry on the conversation one-to-one.

Lets just NOT do it on the main page, for the collective good.

Hope you have a great day, DV


 * What's the point? Why are you trolling here? It can be checked in 5 minutes that you lie, you only have to look on the discussion and history pages. What do you want from me? Iunaw (talk) 19:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Gnangarra 15:04, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

unhappy for the community at large
I guess I way under estimated how big of an ax you have to grind. For this I am sorry. You can have the page, to the loss of all the rest of us who prefer the clear, unbiased picture uncolored by an obviously disgruntled consumer. Believe it or not some people are very happy with the product and actually use it constructively. I perfer to spend my time helping out that community, not playing some self appointed consumer advicote with a big chip on his shoulder.

I hope your soap box cracks.

Have a great day!

DV —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dvescovi (talk • contribs) 17:17, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Information for better conduct
Here are the links to the code of conduct pages along with a tutorial you should read and follow.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Gnangarra 14:57, 13 April 2008 (UTC) struck my signature
 * I believe this is a good faith attempt by to point towards a means of finding a resolution to the issue rather than any attempt to misrepresent a warning. Gnangarra 14:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Trolls never act on good faith. Refer to Gumstix and sections below for more information. This template should be either quoted or removed. Iunaw (talk) 14:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Quoted Iunaw (talk) 19:45, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Please read the following pages:

 * Neutral point of view policy
 * NPOV dispute
 * Wikipedia Tutorial Talk pages

Have a great day!

Dvescovi (talk) 00:57, 14 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Thank you for putting the same information i added to your talk page here. It's like playing with a small child Iunaw (talk) 19:28, 14 April 2008 (UTC)