User talk:Iurii Komogorov

Welcome!
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 06:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

NSM
Dear Iurii,

I have removed the section on in-form in the article on Natural Semantic Metalanguage. NSM is a tool for research in lexicography. As far as I see in-form’s aim is completely different (enabling communication, “escaping from the Linguistic Matrix” …), it is a type of pasigraphy, apparently not based on NSM. Furthermore it has not been recognised publicly, thus its importance for any topic remains unattestable. I hope you have als read my comments on your German talk page.

Best! --Chricho ∀ (talk) 08:04, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quality (philosophy), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Object. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:12, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Minor edits
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. --John (talk) 16:23, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 23:24, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Being
All sources must be WP:VERIFIABLE. You restored an edit that had a source that could not be identified and thus could not be verified, a link to a Google book on someone's library, which of course no one else could read. There was no "approval" by senior editors, we don't do that. Not even editors as senior as me can officially approve content. Doug Weller talk 15:04, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ''Ok, this has to stop. You are promoting/spamming your own blog, which fails WP:RS and cannot be used as a source. You've been warned before about similar edits.'' Doug Weller  talk 15:34, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Quantity. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 17:52, 10 October 2016 (UTC)