User talk:Iva Tarbell

July 2013
Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Craig Kelly (politician) because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 12:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Craig Kelly (politician), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ''If you dispute the material you are trying to remove, begin a conversation at the talk page. But don't remove cited material without proper reason.'' WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:55, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Craig Kelly (politician), you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:58, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Craig Kelly (politician), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Craig Kelly (politician) was changed by Iva Tarbell (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962454 on 2013-07-01T13:02:32+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:02, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 12 hours for continuing to add poorly sourced content/opinion and ignoring requests to stop and discuss at article talk page, as you did at Craig Kelly (politician). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:38, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Three different editors reverted you at that article. That means you are going against community wishes. When your block expires, please use the article talk page to seek consensus before continuing to add content to that article. You are very welcome here, but we must work together on articles. No single editor can force his/her will. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 14:48, 1 July 2013 (UTC)


 * If you want to influence that article, the only way is to wait until this block expires (or appeal it), then discuss changes you wish to make at the article talk. If you try to evade the block by using an IP, then that IP will be blocked and this account will be indefinitely blocked. The article talk page is the best and only avenue. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 16:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)