User talk:Ivalo1111

Welcome to Wikipedia!
Hello, Ivalo1111, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made to British Rail Class 68 seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Danners430 (talk) 12:29, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

May 2023
Hi Ivalo1111! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at British Rail Class 321 that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. XAM2175 (T) 10:56, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Class 802 (2) photo
Did you take that photo yourself, as you claim on the upload? I find it suspicious that it's shown as fully-copyrighted here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/rail_scenes/52672949234. XAM2175 (T) 13:36, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

February 2024
Hello, I'm Danners430. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, British Rail Class 810, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 09:22, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at British Rail Class 810, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Danners430 (talk) 19:14, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at British Rail Class 810, you may be blocked from editing. Danners430 (talk) 19:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at British Rail Class 810. Danners430 (talk) 19:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at British Rail Class 810 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Danners430 (talk) 19:33, 29 February 2024 (UTC)