User talk:IvanAbrenica

October 2016
Hello, I'm Marianna251. I noticed that in this edit to Eddie Gil, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Marianna251TALK 10:45, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Eddie Gil, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. FalconK (talk) 11:25, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Eddie Gil, you may be blocked from editing. FalconK (talk) 11:29, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Further to that, I've gone ahead and removed the paragraph that wasn't properly cited, and amended the citation for the one that was a dead link but available in archive.org. If there is some other reason to remove that content, please discuss it on the article's talkpage.  FalconK (talk) 11:36, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Eddie Gil. I have explained the reasons why your continued removal of this content is not appropriate in my reply to you on my talk page. Marianna251TALK 12:19, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, IvanAbrenica. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Eddie Gil, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
 * instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. Marianna251TALK 12:19, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Eddie Gil. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Muffled Pocketed  12:21, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. Muffled Pocketed  14:56, 3 October 2016 (UTC)