User talk:IvanOS

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, IvanOS! Thank you for your contributions. I am Marek69 and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Marek. 69  talk  22:07, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article

Nomination of NK Elektra Osijek for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NK Elektra Osijek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/NK Elektra Osijek until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Timbouctou ( talk ) 21:22, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

List of active separatist movements in Europe
Why did you remove so much info without any comment or discussion, proving the need for it? Please clarify on the talk page of the article. Thank you. --Jurisdr1975 (talk) 17:56, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Igralište Kraj Drave for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Igralište Kraj Drave is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Igralište Kraj Drave until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GregorB (talk) 20:48, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NK Elektra Osijek.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:NK Elektra Osijek.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 21:26, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Non-free images and templates
Per WP:NFCC #9, the use of non-free images, such as File:Cibalia09.svg.png, is not permitted on templates, such as Template:User HNK Cibalia. You've restored a number of these violations. Please be aware that continuing to willfully violate this policy is a blockable offense. Do not restore this or any other non-free image to any non-article page on the project. If you have questions about this, please ask. Thank you, --Hammersoft (talk) 20:03, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GNK Dinamo Zagreb.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:GNK Dinamo Zagreb.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:29, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Osijek (banner).svg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Osijek (banner).svg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 00:22, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NK Inter Zaprešić.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:NK Inter Zaprešić.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 03:54, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Flag of Osijek.svg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Flag of Osijek.svg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:20, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

Removing Serbian references
I noteced you went troughout wikipedia removing Serbian naming of places in Croatia. I have no patience to revert every article where you did this, however, in places with important minority it is usual to have their version of the name, as well. I noteced you didn´t removed the Hungarian version of the name or any other, so I conclude you have some particular issue with Serbian references. Anyway, I hope you speak English and you understand this, so I will kindly ask you to revert yourself in places where your edits were innadequate and to please start using edit summaries. Best regards, FkpCascais (talk) 18:22, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Hungarian descriptions are long time on that articles. Serbian descriptions had been added later, wtihout consent of other users. The biggest problem of Serb descriptions on articles are infoboxes, where MirkoS18 put them, although they should not be there. -- Ivan  OS 


 * And I also noticed above mentioned activities. I would just like to tell you that it is not in accordance with usual manners on Wikipedia. This is particularly unacceptable when it does not specify any reason (I can speak from my own mistakes). I've canceled your changes in articles about settlements in Eastern Croatia (and several other) at all Wikipedias so you do not have anything to do just be more careful in future. With rules that you are probably familiar, please also see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Croatia. There we had a discussion that can be helpful. Although you delet almost exclusively Serbian versions of names I noticed that you also deleted a few names in Hungarian? and German so I do not know do you have something exclusively against the Serbian language, or you just are not sure what is the policy towards minority languages ​​in general. I want to believe that the second is true because otherwise neither my comment would not have sense. Have a nice day.--MirkoS18 (talk) 23:47, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
 * No, false. On Wikiproject Croatia you had only written that you will put that descriptions in articles, but then nobody had agreed with that. That means you had put that descriptions in articles without consent of other user from Wikiproject Croatia. That is reason of my edits. --User:IvanOS --[[User:color="Blue">Ivan   OS 

Please stop removing serbian names of citys and places in Croatia. Especialy in Vukovar county and muncipality of Borovo because serbian language is co-offical in Borovo and Serb minority has right to use serbian language and whole county is bilingual by law of Republic of Croatia. Don not remove it anymore. --talk

Orphaned non-free image File:GNK Dinamo Zagreb.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:GNK Dinamo Zagreb.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:44, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NK Olimpija Osijek.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:NK Olimpija Osijek.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:30, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

December 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on List of active separatist movements in Europe. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not continue removing content of this page against the consensus reached on the talk page. Jsorens (talk) 20:23, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Removing Serbian references II
I noteced you again went troughout wikipedia removing Serbian naming of places in Croatia on the grounds that such an agreement was reached on WikiProject Croatia. However, what you're saying is a lie, such an agreement is not reached. Actualy, we agreed that Cyrillic script will be used everywhere where have official status. Now we try to agree how to use it places where have no official status, but there are still a significant percentage of serbian minority. For that reason I removed all recent changes that you made. I hope you will continue to work constructively contrions, and counsel in connection of application of agreements. Have a nice day/night.--MirkoS18 (talk) 19:22, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
 * As I have written, on Wikiproject Croatia it was not agreed putting of Serb descriptions. -- Ivan  OS 

Cyrillic
The constitution of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina states that: "The official languages of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina shall be: Bosnian language, Croat language and Serb language. The official scripts shall be Latin and Cyrillic." Do not remove Cyrillic from the articles. -- ◅PRODUCER  ( TALK ) 15:43, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Sorry, my failure. -- Ivan  OS 

Tvoje izmene
Ej dečko, ova izmena i ova izmena nikako nisu u skladu jedna sa drugom. Zamolio bih te da prestaneš sa takvim ponašanjem i da postaneš konstruktivan korisnik. Ja se ne slažem sa onim što korisnik MirkoS18 radi kod članaka o mestima Hrvatske, ali to ti ne daje nikakvo pravo da vršiš neku ličnu "odmazdu" na člancima o mestima u Srbiji. Takvo ponašanje nije u skladu sa pravilima Vikipedije i administratori bi te mogli blokirati ako im neko pokaže da u isto vreme uklanjaš srpsko ime iz članaka o Hrvatskoj a ubacuješ hrvatsko ime u članke o Srbiji (to je primer očiglednog POV-a). Ovo shvati samo kao prijateljski savet. PANONIAN 10:11, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Nemam ništa protiv što si dodao hrvatsko ime u članak o Sonti, ali zašto si u isto vreme obrisao srpsko ime iz članka o Krnjku? Postoji li neka logika iza dva tako različita ponašanja? PANONIAN  10:27, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * OK, a onda mi reci i ovo: zašto su članci o Srbiji drugačiji od članaka o Hrvatskoj i zašto bi u člancima o Srbiji manjinska imena stajala u infoboxu a u člancima o Hrvatskoj ne? PANONIAN  10:37, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- DIREKTOR  ( TALK ) 05:54, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

You seem to be ignorant
... of the fact that Serbian is the first language in Montenegro by the number of speakers (see the latest census). Now that you've been informed about the fact, you should stop with your nonsensical deletions of Serbian Cyrillic names in articles about towns and villages in Montenegro. Another possibility is that you already know about the fact, in which case your deletions may have a very problematic motivation (to say the least). I see that you are persistent in removing relevant Serbian Cyrillic names from other articles too. Vladimir (talk) 11:57, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Official language in Montenegro is Montenegrin. See Montenegro and Languages in Montenegro. That is reason of my edits. -- Ivan  OS 

Serb National Council
Please stop moving the article away from its original title. This title was discussed and agreed upon earlier. If you have issues with it raise them in the talk page first.  Timbouctou ( talk ) 17:57, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Serb National Council of the Republic of Croatia should not be identified and related to, for example, Serb National Council of the Republic of Kosovo etc. -- Ivan  OS 

conflict with MirkoS18 etc
In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you continue with the behaviour on Trpinja, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you.

I've given all the parties some leeway at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Croatia, but after the discussion was effectively completed, apparently with just a single comment from you, you've continued to make edits such as this or this or this or this. We can all have a legitimate disagreement about fringe or corner cases, but in these kinds of villages where there's a clear and undisputed minority presence there is no valid reason for this kind of behavior, one that seems like it's only done to make a point and perpetuate the problem. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 21:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Series of edits such as this and this also deter much of the assumption of good faith. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 21:40, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Both you and User Mirko need to cool it with the constant changing of the town/village pages. It has been agreed that settlements with majority minority peoples would have the names in the lead sentence, and there is usually no need for a "Name" section unless there are more than 3 languages. --Jesuislafete (talk) 03:08, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Despite warnings, this keeps happening. In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 08:55, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Please stop with

 * 1. Removal of alternative Croatian names for places in Vojvodina. If some Croat politicians recently proclaimed that some of the place names in Croatian are changed that does not mean that other names were not used in Croatian before such official proclamation i.e. Bački Monoštor was certainly known as Bački Monoštor in Croatian before it was renamed to Monoštor.
 * Visit hnv.org.rs -- Ivan  OS 


 * 2. Placement of Croatian name before Hungarian or Bunjevac one in the settlements where number of Hungarians or Bunjevci is larger than number of Croats. The only NPOV way of listing these names is to list them in order that respects size of each ethnic group. Or you want to say that Croatian ethnicity is somehow more important than Hungarian one? PANONIAN  22:17, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * By alphabetical order Croatian goes first, then Hungarian. Bunjevac is not a language: it is dialect only, so it should be on last place. -- Ivan  OS 

HNK Vukovar 1991
Evo izmjenio sam tekst jer nemam informaciju da je novi klub osnovan, tek da je donesena odluka da će se osnovati.

Pozdrav! Cro ed (talk) 15:54, 5 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Sve je u redu. -- Ivan  OS 

Disambiguation link notification for March 17
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Split-Makarska (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Split


 * Roman Catholic Diocese of Dubrovnik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Split

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Template:Cathedrals of Croatia edit
Don't do this. If you want to remove some apparently valid navbox content that was there since the creation of the template in May 2010‎, you need to provide a reason. When you've already been warned about tendentious editing regarding the Croatian Serb minority, you need to go the extra mile to prove your good faith, not hide apparent censorship of topics you don't like in another innocuous edit. This is your last warning. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 14:24, 18 April 2012 (UTC)


 * Orthodox church in Zagreb officialy is not cathedral. Term cathedral is primary used in Western Christianity (Roman Catholic, Protestant). Officialy name of this church (in Croatian) is Saborna crkva, but on Croatian Wikipedia (I do not know why?) it says Katedrala Preobraženja Gospodnjeg. In Serbian Wikipedia, which is the most precise and accurate as far as it, it says Saborna crkva u Zagrebu. In English, exact term for Saborna crkva probably do not exist, but it is used term Orthodox Cathedral, which is not incorrect, but... I am not sure. -- Ivan  OS  15:37, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hotel Osijek


A tag has been placed on Hotel Osijek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 15:34, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

--Alexdalesandro (talk) 02:07, 9 November 2012 (UTC)

SC
Hello IvanOS. By all appearances, you're currently engaged in a campaign of sorts to remove all lead references to the Serbo-Croatian language you come across. Let me assure you that, regardless of what you may or may not believe in this respect, this project is written according to sources - and the sources are practically unanimous with regard to Serbo-Croatian being the language we speak. Being from Split, I am fully aware of the general misapprehension that prevails in our country regarding the relationship of our language with those of our neighbors from ex-Yugoslavia, but a common error is no less an error.

Without going into too much talk: I assure you that the sources for SC are overwhelming. There just is no contest. Its not even close. This has been established on Talk:Serbo-Croatian and a WP:CONSENSUS is currently in effect based on said sources. Should you wish to challenge said consensus, please do so on the main article. That's basically it.

All that said, I have no intention of going about changing "Croatian" or "Serbian" into "Serbo-Croatian", but I won't stand by and let you embark on a massive campaign to remove SC where it already stands. That just will not fly. No way. Should you start restoring your edit everywhere, there won't be an edit-war: there'll simply be an immediate report on WP:AE, accompanied by the myriad sources and various other diffs. Lets not go there.

This problem we're having here is due to a major inconsistency. Wikipedia will eventually have to figure out what do do on this issue, but until such a time, lets not touch the status quo or there'll be no end to this. Best regards :)  --  Director  ( talk )  00:01, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
 * You removed SC lede entries with the explanation "Croatian is the official language in Croatia"?
 * 1. The translations listed in article leads have nothing to do with "official languages". They are simply there to translate the subject of the article in other languages, not to depict the official language in any way (infoboxes are usually used for that).
 * 2. Croatian is a variant of the Serbo-Croatian language. So if its official, then Serbo-Croatian is official - since its not more than a formalized standard of Serbo-Croatian (again, this is the sources talking).
 * Please respond here so we can discuss this and any other misunderstandings we have. -- Director  ( talk )  17:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Croats of Vojvodina
I returned the article Croats of Vojvodina If you have time you can help.--Sokac121 (talk) 12:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Hvala za Barnstar:)--Sokac121 (talk) 20:15, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

!
Ako jos jedan put ces da brises podaci bez bilo kakve rasprave o tome, ces da pricas sa administratorima. Соколрус (talk) 18:42, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Glupost si napisao. Politika to je pouzdan izvor, to svi znaju. Isto i kniga Sekulica. Imas ti nju i u clanku o ratu u Hrvatskoj i u ostalim clancima. Prema pravilniku u clanku moraju biti svi verzije a ti stavis samo hrvatsku. Соколрус (talk) 19:14, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

ANI notice
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Operatiom Storm. Thank you. Monty 845  19:18, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Skype
Hi ! Imas li Skajp ? Соколрус (talk) 13:55, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Branko Mihaljević Children's Theatre


The article Branko Mihaljević Children's Theatre has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Newly created article on non-notable children's theatre. No independent refs. No claim of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 23:01, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gallery Waldinger


A tag has been placed on Gallery Waldinger requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Harry the Dog WOOF  16:32, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gallery Vernissage


A tag has been placed on Gallery Vernissage requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Harry the Dog WOOF  16:33, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Faculty of Agriculture, University of Osijek


The article Faculty of Agriculture, University of Osijek has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable academic grouping. No independent refs. Reasonably recent foundation. No claim to notability. No interwiki link.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:54, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Hotel Osijek


A tag has been placed on Hotel Osijek requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 14:37, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Hotel Osijek for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hotel Osijek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Hotel Osijek until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Basa lisk inspect damage⁄berate 16:37, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Faculty of Agriculture, University of Osijek


The article Faculty of Agriculture, University of Osijek has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable academic unit. No independent refs. PROD removed by creator without comment, concern was "Non-notable academic grouping. No independent refs. Reasonably recent foundation. No claim to notability. No interwiki link."

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:19, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Faculty of Agriculture, University of Osijek for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Faculty of Agriculture, University of Osijek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Faculty of Agriculture, University of Osijek until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Not your siblings&#39; deletionist (talk) 09:38, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Glas Slavonije.svg)
Thanks for uploading File:Glas Slavonije.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:11, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

August 2012
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flag of Dalmatia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. These edits appear to be WP:VANDALISM. Please refrain from going forward with such edits without consensus, thank you. -- Director  ( talk )  16:49, 14 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. When you recently edited Travno, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Urban settlement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 04:00, 19 August 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:NK Zadar.svg)
Thanks for uploading File:NK Zadar.svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kninska Krajina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zagora (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:58, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Vukovar water tower-before war.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Vukovar water tower-before war.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:20, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Church of Our Lady of Rosary, Vrlika, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint Anthony (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:54, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Croat National Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tavankut (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Croatian Radio Osijek
Hello IvanOS,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Croatian Radio Osijek for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Anastasia Bykova (talk) 00:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Dalmatianism
Once again I have declined the speedy deletion of Dalmatianism. There are very specific criteria that an article must meet to be able to be speedy deleted. The reason you gave in your extended deletion rationale might be enough to have the article deleted via the WP:PROD or WP:AFD process but not through the speedy deletion process. GB fan 17:05, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * You can use the WP:Proposed deletion or the WP:Articles for deletion process. If you use the proposed deletion process the article will stay for seven days unless someone objects and then the proposed deletion process stops.  If you decide on the Articles for deletion process then there will be a seven day discussion and an admin will evaluate the arguements made and decide if the consensus is to delete the article.  WP:AFDHOWTO explains how to nominate an article under the Articles for deletion process and Proposed deletion explains how to nominate under the Proposed deletion process.  If you need addition help let me know.  GB fan 17:34, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * There is no conceivable reason why the article need be deleted. You can certainly expect opposition at a hypothetical AfD. -- Director  ( talk )  17:57, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

Dalmatianism did exist, retract your deletion
I'm tired of deletionist bullshit. Dalmatian Autonomists won substantial support in the 1860s. This book says Dalmatian nationalism existed in the 19th century but faded: Egbert Jahn. Nationalism in Late and Post-Communist Europe: The Failed Nationalism of the Multinational and Partial National States, Volume 1. Nomos, 2008. Dalmatian autonomism has continued to exist. You go on and on saying "That party was unpopular and hated because it was established by anti-Croats, so people from Dalmatia did not wanted that party. Why? They know they are Croats and they live in free Croatia, in free Croatian Dalmatia.", so you are a typical Balkan ultranationalist full of national pride, suspicion of traitors in your country, calling Croats who don't identify with a Croatian nation above all as "anti-Croats", that's worth nothing on an encyclopedia based on reliable sources. Talk to User:DIREKTOR who identified it as a mid-importance level article. I'm tired of this type of shit on Wikipedia.--R-41 (talk) 19:11, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Lets keep it civil, R-41.. That said, Dalmatianism was (and perhaps still is) a real ideology. I see no point in quibbling here and now, but you fellas can expect my opposing any potential AfDs. I've been a staunch and persistent opponent of excessive "Italianization" in Dalmatia and Istria-related articles, but I like to think I am an objective participant not motivated by any particular national ideology. Regarding the article in question my "Excessive Italianziation Alarm" did not sound in the slightest. Its sourced, and I know from common knowledge (being myself a Dalmatian - of the non-canine variety) that the ideology is a real and significant one. The article seems perfectly fine. -- Director  ( talk )  20:02, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user working on articles concerning the Balkans. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the Arbitration Committee's decision. (Varivode) Thank you.--MirkoS18 (talk) 16:55, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * You have been mentioned on my talk page; if you wish to comment, the thread is located here. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 15:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ninski Stanovi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Stadion pod Bijelim Brijegom
Please stop removing content from this page because the changes are historically accurate. I don't see why are you having problems with the new content. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Housefrommars (talk • contribs) 22:50, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

List of active separatist movements in Europe
I want to ask you why did you removed that sourced info without talk page agreement? You should revert your self, and use talk page in order to gain some useful agreement about the subject. Please, do that, i am waiting for you there. -- WhiteWriterspeaks 17:54, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I am again calling you to solve this issue, or at least restore the content until we agree. -- WhiteWriterspeaks 19:06, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Edit Warring
You have violated WP:1RR at both Serbo-Croatian language and Croatian language and may be subject to blocks or bans of your editing privileges if you continue your edit warring. --Taivo (talk) 18:00, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Zemun
Molim te prestani sa hrvatskim lažima i maštanjima vezanim za opštinu Zemun,hvala.Please stop with your lies,these football clubs existed only during Ustashi occupation,Zemun is not in Vojvodina,and is certainly not in Croatia.Zašto imam osećaj da je članak napisan u duhu "Hrvatska do Zemuna",zaista ne razumem zašto postoji ovakav članak kome je uopšte bitno kakav su rezultat postigli klubovi koji su postojali par godina za vreme okupacije jednog dela Srbije?

94.189.197.200 (talk) 13:54, 9 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Prije svega, zašto se ti ne registriraš? Što se tiče tih članaka o hrvatskim nogometnim klubovima u Zemunu, obraćaš se na krivu adresu. Te članke nisam pisao ja, nego jedan suradnik iz tih krajeva. Tvoje sam izmjene uklonio zato što upravo ti iznosiš netočne (lažne) podatke, s obzirom da su članci pisani 2009. i da dosad nije bilo problema vezanih za njih i da si neregistiran pa se tvoje izmjene mogu smatrati vandalizmom. Kao što sam rekao, autor članka dolazi iz tog kraja zbog čega najbolje poznaje to područje zanimanja. Isti suradnik je pouzdan, što znači da piše istinite podatke i činjenice, koje su suprotne od onoga što ti zastupaš. A činjenice su:


 * Zemun je do 1945. bio u Vojvodini, kada je pripojen Beogradu;


 * Svi hrvatski zemunski nogometni klubovi osnovani su prije 2. svjetskog rata, jer činjenica je da su u to vrijeme Hrvati bili većina u Zemunu, ali onda kasnije njihov je broj opadao zbog srpske politike marginalizacije Hrvata. Treba podsjetiti da Srbija i danas provodi istu politiku prema hrvatskoj manjini u Srbiji.

Ti također nemaš prava vrijeđati hrvatsku Wikipediju i Hrvate, s obzirom da su Srbi ti koji lažu i izmišljaju. -- Ivan  OS  13:43, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Alo Hrvoje nemoje da lažeš,Hrvati decenijama su beznačajna manjina u Zemunu,ko vas to laže,to što vaša matica hrvatska piše o Zemunu nije tačno to je gomila gluposti,čitao sam članak na tom sajtu to je gomila nebuloza,propaganda praktično,čak se sugeriše da su Srbi proterali Hrvate iz Zemuna ili čak da su Srbi koji su se doselili iz drugog dela Beograda mogu smatrati okupatorima!!!Pa to je van pameti.Ja se zaista pitam kako vas kao naciju nije sramota uopšte da govorite nekom o etničkom čišćenju,ali stvarno!Zemun nikada nije deo Vojvodine,znači Zemun se spojio sa Beogradom 1934 a to je bilo u Kraljevini Jugoslaviji a tad nije postojala Vojvodina,Jugoslavija je bila podeljena na banovine.Znam ja šta biste vi najviše voleli Zemun Srijemu,Srijem Vojvodini a Vojvodina Hrvatskoj.Kako da ne.Da za vreme NDH je verovatno bilo u Zemunu najbolje,da da.Najbolji dan za sve Zemunce je bio dan kada se sjedinio s Beogradom,Beograd je samo par kilometar od Zemuna,a vi biste ga pripojili vojvodini,pa gde bi Zemunci išli na studije u Novi Sad?Niko vas ne vređa,ništa ružno nisam rekao,autor dolazi iz tog kraja,kog kraja Hrvat iz Subotice, pa i ja sam Srbin iz Zemuna,pa šta?Na onom izvoru koji je naveden nigde ne piše kada je osnovan pišu samo razultati.Takođe vrlo smešno prvo kažeš nemoj da vređaš a zatim napišeš "Srbi su ti koji lažu i izmišljaju".Takođe procenat Hrvata u opštini Zemunu po popisu 2011. je 0,84 % gde li su ti silni Hrvati nestali za ovih 70 godina?

94.189.197.200 (talk) 14:48, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
 * S anonimcem se nemam namjere prepirati. Uostalom, sve sam rekao jasno. -- Ivan  OS  15:23, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Jasno ali lažno.Koji je izvor za članke o hrvatskim nogometnim klubovima u Zemunu?Kakve veze ima što je neko anoniman,a nije registrovan?Loše po tebe što veruješ u te hrvatske laži o Zemunu,ne valja ti taj nacionalizam.I nije ti pametno da jedan narod nazivaš lažljivim bojim se da je to povreda pravila vikipedije.A takođe je jeziva sama činjenica da su lokalne zemunske ustaše učestvovale u fudbalskom tačmičenju NDH.Hvala Bogu da su zabranjeni.Najbolje bi bilo za tebe da odbaciš ta bolesna,gnusna i ustaška razmišljanja.

94.189.197.200 (talk) 15:28, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Re: IP Vandal
As I just told Sokac, you too can follow the instructions at SPI to have it investigated. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 16:52, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

Ja još uvek čekam da budem blokiran,nadam se da će biti neko delotvorno blokiranje,s obzirom da se adrese menjaju svakih par dana.

24.135.66.10 (talk) 13:44, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
 * G'day, reported as sock of Oldhouse2012 here Sockpuppet investigations/Oldhouse2012. Regards, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 05:53, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

This was the Nth time you went around removing referenced edits by MirkoS18. I've warned you time and time again, and yet you keep reverting without discussion. Please don't do that. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 17:56, 25 February 2013 (UTC) Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- WhiteWriterspeaks 12:22, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 604800 seconds for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nyttend (talk) 13:00, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Got your email. I've recently had negative interactions with WhiteWriter, so I'm not inclined to trust his statements without checking.  However, checking your edits showed that he was telling the truth; it was tempting to block you for a substantially longer period of time, since deleting referenced information without explanation is highly problematic, and it was made worse by (1) your recent block for the same thing, (2) the fact that you were edit-warring, and (3) the contentious nature of the topic.  Nyttend (talk) 15:59, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Edits like this make me question how dedicated you are to building a neutral encyclopedia. WhiteWriter told me that you were causing problems, and after reviewing your edits, I agree with his conclusions: it definitely looks as if you're using Wikipedia as a battleground against Serbs and Serbian influence.  If I learn that you're continuing in this way, I expect that you'll be blocked for substantially longer than a week, since nationalistic battles are a good example of generally disruptive editing.  Nyttend (talk) 17:07, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * As you already know, the Wikipedia-official name for the language is Serbo-Croatian, and this search shows that the term is commonly used in academia. If you were making these changes amid many others, I wouldn't have any reason for objecting (and if I were watching the pages, I probably wouldn't notice), but your edit summaries, patterns of editing, and rationales at my talk page only convince me more and more that you're seeing this project as a battleground.  Nyttend (talk) 17:36, 19 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Ask the English-language academics who don't have a stake in these disputes, and they'll tell you that Serbian and Croatian are the same language, just like Moldovan and Romanian. Don't continue your anti-Serb battle onto my talk page, since I couldn't care either way; if you were a Serb trying to efface Croatian from articles like these, I'd tell you precisely the same thing.  Nyttend (talk) 17:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Widespread deletion of referenced contributions on minority languages
Please stop to delete my referenced contributions. Agreement you're talking about does not exist. We have wide consent that minority languages ​​should be included if they are present in reality. The only disagreement is over whether minority name should be written in line official name, as I did it at the beginning since there are official minority languages, or section name or native name is more appropriate. While other people agree with my initial proposal (with the exception of your and Šokac unexplained and unfounded positions), Direktor insisted that it was not a right line since we currently do not have document that explicitly cites the name in that way. But nobody is talking about agreement that for some reason prohibit usage of some (but not all) minority languages in infoboxes about villages and municipalities in Croatia. Have a nice day.--MirkoS18 (talk) 10:16, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Church of Saint Nicholas, Kistanje for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Church of Saint Nicholas, Kistanje is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Church of Saint Nicholas, Kistanje until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. UnrepentantTaco (talk) 20:57, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Problematic sources
Hello, if you think there is a POV source or there is anything wrong with it, please use the noticeboard to solve this problem. I personally don`t think there is a problem with this sources because they are books by demographics. True they are hosted on strange pages, but the pages just host them nothing more. Greetings. Adrian (talk) 17:38, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you.

As you may have suspected already, this is because of a summer-long edit war on Vukovar. Please use dispute resolution next time. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 11:23, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Split (banner).svg)
Thanks for uploading File:Split (banner).svg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:34, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:01, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (2013–14 NK Osijek season) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating 2013–14 NK Osijek season, IvanOS!

Wikipedia editor OccultZone just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"You have to specify your references."

To reply, leave a comment on OccultZone's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for April 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 NK Osijek season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Josip Mišić (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Please stop
Deleting parameter "pron" from Croatian pronunciation templates. It is quite unnecessary. Which other pronunciation do readers expect in Croatia-related articles?  Timbouctou ( talk ) 19:33, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, stop adding flagicons in infoboxes and stop arbitrarily deleting minority language names for placenames in Croatia like you did here.  Timbouctou ( talk ) 19:42, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, stop adding diacritics in defaultsort parameters like you did here. Thanks.  Timbouctou ( talk ) 19:45, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain
From commenting on my talk page in the future. Also, refrain from edit-warring, and remember to use sources for your edits.  Timbouctou ( talk ) 10:50, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * The truth hurts, isn't? -- Ivan  OS  10:53, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * You will be reported and banned if you don't stop disrupting Wikipedia. That's the only "truth" here.  Timbouctou ( talk ) 10:55, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
 * You should stop with censorship. -- Ivan  OS  11:01, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

May 2014
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Your repetitive violations of the edit warring policy, esp. in hot-button issues, are what caused this. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 06:42, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

June 2014
Note: the division used now has better support in sources, and is based on at least some sort of a consensus. Do not edit-war and take your concerns to the talkpage, you don't appear to understand the problems at issue. You were already blocked repeatedly for this exact sort of disruptive behavior and will be reported again should you continue. Your pattern of roaming the project edit-warring against for this cause and that is not acceptable. -- Director  ( talk )  07:22, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * What sources do you talking about? According to all sources which are available you won't find this division what you advocate for. That division is unreal and fictional, seems that you use Wikipedia for promotion of your personal (autonomist) attitudes. In almost all sources you will find 5 Croatian macroregions, which are not official subdivisions: Central Croatia, Eastern Croatia, Mountainous Croatia, Northern Croatian Littoral and Southern Croatian Littoral. Historical regions of Croatia are not only Slavonia, Dalmatia, Istria and "Croatia proper" as you claim, and they are also not official subdivisions, so there is no reason to put their historical flags and coats of arms, which were used before hundred and more years. That "Croatia proper" (or "region Croatia") I put in quotation marks because it is wrong to call area around Zagreb proper Croatia. That area always was named Central Croatia. Croatia is not only Zagreb, Croatia are also Dalmatia, Slavonia, Istria etc., like it or not. Don't forget that first Croatian state originated in Dalmatia. That division you suggest was valid only during Austria-Hungary, when Croatian lands were disunited. Also, that your wrong and fictional regional division of Croatia confirms fact that you incorporated Mountainous Croatia to Central Croatia! That is the biggest stupidity I have ever heard! -- Ivan  OS  15:16, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * And its clear to me your only purpose here is to push nationalist nonsense regardless of anything the refs might say. Kindly read the discussion in question at the relevant article before you start another one of your typical vitriolic edit-warring campaigns. As has been explained in detail, there are numerous problems with the nonsensical and confusing system you espouse (and will continue to promote regardless of any evidence since, in a rather pitiable turn, you see it as an ideological issue). To start with, there isn't a single source in existence, anywhere, that divides Croatia into "Central Croatia, Dalmatia, Mountainous Croatia, Slavonia, and the Northern Croatian Littoral". -- Director  ( talk )  15:49, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * @Tomboe. Ah yes, your one 50-year-old source from the SFRY. Pardon me if I find it ironic that you're claiming "OR" for a term supported by 2,900 sources, whereas you have just made it clear you believe yourself to be the authority that decides whether or not "Slavonia" is just another word for "Eastern Croatia" - especially when your own map rubbishes that claim: with your "Central Croatia" encroaching on areas and regions that have always traditionally been Slavonia. The same thing with Dalmatia. But I think its clear this is personal, as you've shown you are completely fine with creating a complete and total duplicate WP:CONTENTFORK (your "Northern Croatian Littoral") just to maintain the illusion of feasibility for your scheme. --  Director  ( talk )  16:26, 8 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NK Grafičar Osijek.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:NK Grafičar Osijek.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:34, 29 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Croat National Council of Serbia.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Croat National Council of Serbia.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:39, 12 July 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Coat of arms of Osijek.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Coat of arms of Osijek.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:27, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Blato 1902


A tag has been placed on Blato 1902 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content or organised event, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Finngall  talk  18:46, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Split, name
I invite you to the discussion here, since you were interested in that question recently. Asdisis (talk) 20:37, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 HŠK Zrinjski Mostar season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Srđan Stanić. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 3 September 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NK Široki Brijeg.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:NK Široki Brijeg.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:37, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

Braslav, Duke of Lower Pannonia
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Braslav, Duke of Lower Pannonia, you may be blocked from editing. --Z oupan 04:24, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Your edits on articles about Croatian history are disruptive, because they are insolent and aggressive. Seems that you have some complexes and problems with Croatia. Before your edits, article names were Ratimir of Pannonian Croatia and Braslav of Pannonian Croatia. You moved them arbitrarily and now you think you are right. Well, you are not. -- Ivan  OS  18:55, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

Contact
Can you please contact me at tomogrigor@gmail.com regarding some entries?Mrwilhelm (talk) 20:38, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

AN/I notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. VS6507 (talk) 11:41, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:VK Kruna-Osijek.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:VK Kruna-Osijek.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:57, 26 February 2015 (UTC)

Serbian Cyrillic alphabet in lead section of article Trpinja
I invite you to take part in conversation on Talk page of article Trpinja regarding your recent edit changes.--MirkoS18 (talk) 20:06, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--MirkoS18 (talk) 17:14, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Livno
Hi, since we had some problems with the Livno article, here is my statement: 1. Muslims got their original name "Bosniaks" back in 1993 (Correct) 2. The wikiproject Bosnia and Herzegovina started a campaign (long time ago) to make users from other states/countries better and easier informed about which ethnic groups reside in Bosnia and Herzegovina, that's why, some articles have Bosniaks (Which ain't wrong right now) and some still have Muslims in the Demographics part of articles, i'm just trying to make a point and it's that they are the same, after 1918 (In the SHS) the official name used since medieval times got removed. It was halted back by all regimes that ruled Bosnia from 1918 to 1993. 3. Propagating Nationalist or chauvinist views of points on Wikipedia should be left for the userpage atleast, but the articles need to be objective and in accordance to the Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina (in this case). And as the note says, the name Muslim replaced with Bosniaks. Disclaimer:Bosniaks didn't start existing in 1993, you can forget that story for kids, history books proved the existence of this ethnic group (Bošnjani turned into Bošnjaci after historical reforms of south Slavic languages) since medieval times as mentioned above.

Hope You understand. Thanks in advance,

Sincerely Hazbulator™ 20:18, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Minority language
Most kindly I invite you to share your disagreement with the opinion of all the other editors on the issue of use of minority languages in articles on English Wikipedia on this link Talk:Minority language. By participating you might help us to avoid editorial conflicts, overcome eventual misunderstanding and/or and avoid interference from administrators and eventual sanctions.--MirkoS18 (talk) 20:47, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Balkan topo en.jpg|30px|alt=|link=]] In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user editing Balkans-related articles in a disruptive way. If you engage in further inappropriate behaviour in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article/topic ban. Thank you.--MirkoS18 (talk) 17:05, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

We "agreed"?
"Again, we already agreed (few years ago) that minority names won't be in infoboxes, because they are unnecessary, considering we have them in text."

Could you please point me to the discussion with this outcome? Because, I may remember it incorrectly, but I don't think there was an agreement to that effect. GregorB (talk) 17:54, 11 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't intend to look for discussions from few years ago and quote what participants have written, so this will be enough: Jagodnjak (DIREKTOR's edit on 20 December 2011, 06:39). -- Ivan  OS  13:12, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
 * No, I'm sorry, Director's "I thought we agreed" is not enough. There is WP Croatia talk archive, and the onus is on you to provide evidence that any such agreement took place. On the other hand, there is quite concrete evidence that editors virtually unanimously agree that official minority names should be in infoboxes. Please do not make edits which are contrary to established consensus. GregorB (talk) 16:13, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello. I think we've all been patient and reasonable but enough is enough: until you provide a link to the alleged discussion that ruled against official minority names in the infoboxes, I'm going to roll back each and every minority name-removing edit of yours; if you attempt to revert back without discussion, you'll be reported immediately. GregorB (talk) 17:28, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ivan Tirić


The article Ivan Tirić has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 04:00, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

Vandalism
Your constant re-editing and deleting of "aggressive" edits have been consistently reverted, mostly by other editors also of Croatian descent (Gregor, Zoupan, etc). Quit it or you will find yourself blocked AGAIN. You have learned nothing. It is getting tiresome. Quis separabit? 14:52, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent disruptive editing, including edit-warring on numerous articles. You have been repeatedly making changes which you know full well are contrary to consensus, and you have made it clear that you intend to continue to ignore both consensus and messages from other editors about the problems with your editing. Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and editors who are determined to do what they individually prefer, without regard to consensus, are not helpful. The length of the block takes into account the fact that a series of shorter blocks has failed to persuade you to change your approach. If this longer block also fails to persuade you to stop editing disruptively, you may well be blocked for much longer, perhaps even indefinitely. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:57, 7 June 2015 (UTC)

Email
I have read your email, in which you ask why I reverted your edits. The main reason is that most of your edits, as you know, were against consensus. There may be a few edits in among them that would have been worth keeping, but I checked a fairly significant sample of them, and found none. To spend the time checking every one of them would not have been a productive use of time. Another consideration is that experience shows that an editor who has been repeatedly blocked, and has made it clear that he or she has no intention of conforming to Wikipedia policies, who finds that many of his or her edits stay in place will almost certainly just continue in the same way. If, on the other hand, he or she finds that pig-headedly persisting in defying consensus leads to everything he or she does being reverted, there is at least a chance that he or she may change his or her ways. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 20:14, 10 June 2015 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry

 * Are you joking? Did you check IP at all? I'm not only user who don't agree with aggressive edits of MirkoS18 and GregorB, so that account is not my sockpuppet. Awaiting apologies. -- Ivan  OS  08:56, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Told ya  Fortuna  <sup style="color:red;">Imperatrix Mundi  09:10, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

I see that you have continued to use further sockpuppetry during your six-month block for sockpuppetry. In view of this, together with your extensive history of disruptive editing, including persistent edit-warring using several accounts, undeterred by numerous time-limited blocks, it has become evident that you have no intention of starting to edit in accordance with Wikipedia's policies. The block has therefore been extended, and is now indefinite. Further information about the block is on the talk page of your latest sockpuppet. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:50, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

You may or may not find it helpful to contemplate the fact that if you had not continued to use sockpuppets, the block I imposed on the 7th of June would have been due to expire a few hours from now. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:53, 7 July 2015 (UTC)


 * I have read your email. The accounts in question are certainly sockpuppets, and there is an overwhelming probability that they are your sockpuppets. Your insistence on checking IP addresses if anything makes me more strongly inclined to believe that they are. Editors wrongly accused of sockpuppetry don't tend to keep on saying "check the IP addresses" over and over again, while sockpuppeteers frequently do, if they have carefully made sure that they have used different IP addresses with different accounts. It is very easy to use an IP address that has no apparent connection to the one you have been using. (I was doing that myself earlier today, though for a completely different reason: nothing to do with sockpuppetry.) Finally, sending me an email is pointless, as I am not going to take any action on the basis of an email that I wouldn't take on the basis of information posted here, unless there is evidence in the email which needs to be kept confidential, which certainly doesn't apply to any of what you wrote. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:42, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

File:KK Cibona Zagreb.svg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:KK Cibona Zagreb.svg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Steel1943 (talk) 09:35, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RK Zagreb.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:RK Zagreb.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NK Široki Brijeg.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:NK Široki Brijeg.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 16 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KK Zadar.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:KK Zadar.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NK Čakovec.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:NK Čakovec.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Croats of Serbia
Template:Croats of Serbia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NK Osijek.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:NK Osijek.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KK Zadar.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:KK Zadar.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HNK Hajduk Split.svg
Thanks for uploading File:HNK Hajduk Split.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of University of Osijek Faculty of Teacher Education for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article University of Osijek Faculty of Teacher Education is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/University of Osijek Faculty of Teacher Education until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 13:07, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NK Varaždin.svg
Thanks for uploading File:NK Varaždin.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:45, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Category:Faculties of the University of Osijek has been nominated for merging
Category:Faculties of the University of Osijek has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 22:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HRK Izviđač Ljubuški.svg
Thanks for uploading File:HRK Izviđač Ljubuški.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:12, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Institute for Culture of Croats of Vojvodina


The article Institute for Culture of Croats of Vojvodina has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:NORG. A WP:BEFORE search in both English and Croatian yields only trivial mentions."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 20:48, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RK Zagreb.svg
Thanks for uploading File:RK Zagreb.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:23, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NK Slaven-Belupo Koprivnica.svg
Thanks for uploading File:NK Slaven-Belupo Koprivnica.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:14, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NK Istra 1961.svg
Thanks for uploading File:NK Istra 1961.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NK Belišće.svg
Thanks for uploading File:NK Belišće.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Vehicle registration plates of the Croatian Republic of Herzeg-Bosnia


The article Vehicle registration plates of the Croatian Republic of Herzeg-Bosnia has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unsourced POV FORK of Vehicle registration plates of Bosnia and Herzegovina, created by blocked sock. Just copy/pasted small section (in part or in whole) from its source-article on depreciated vehicle registration plates used in part of the country only for couple of years."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ౪ Santa ౪ 99°  08:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)