User talk:Ivankola

Speedy deletion nomination of Gödi SE


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Gödi SE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. MassiveYR (talk) 18:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Ivankola, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Gödi SE have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome. MassiveYR (talk) 22:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bólyi SE


A tag has been placed on Bólyi SE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:40, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Csákvári TK, you may be blocked from editing. ''As the official website clearly shows, these are not the correct kits. Your changes, whilst minor seem to be incorrect. Please stop.'' Fenix down (talk) 10:26, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Ivankola, Could you please explain to me exactly where you are sourcing the changes you are making to a wide variety of football club kits. I am concerned that you are the IP user which I had cause to block several times here. I have already noticed some edits that you have made that appear to be completely unsupported as noted above. I am also concerned that edits such as those you made Siumut Amerdlok Kunuk are not only completely unsupported, but probably unsupported. Could you please respond urgently as I am currently of the opinion that your edits. Quite simply, I do not believe that the information you are adding is accurate. It is so widespread across such a range of low-level football clubs, that I find it difficult to believe that someone would have access to the breadth of information necessary to make these edits genuinely. Additionally, you are adding information to pages which I know other editors who have significant knowledge of the subject have not been able to complete. My disbelief is further compounded by your refusal to add even a single reference for any of the edits you have made. Fenix down (talk) 10:34, 11 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Information orange.svg Please do not add or change content, as you did at A.S. Pizzighettone, without citing a reliable source using an inline citation that clearly supports the material. The burden is on the person wishing to keep in the material to meet these requirements, as a necessary (but not necessarily sufficient) condition. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. (please provide source for your alleged stadium capacity) Matthew_hk   t  c  06:21, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Noah Makutima
Hello, Ivankola. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Noah Makutima, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Noah Makutima to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

TonyBallioni (talk) 21:08, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Noah Makutima


The article Noah Makutima has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:35, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Margitszigeti Atlétikai Centrum


The article Margitszigeti Atlétikai Centrum has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced and poor article. No claims to notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Domdeparis (talk) 19:03, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Felsőzsolca Városi Sportcsarnok
Hello, Ivankola. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Felsőzsolca Városi Sportcsarnok, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Onel 5969  TT me 15:53, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Felsőzsolca Városi Sportcsarnok
Hello, Ivankola,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Felsőzsolca Városi Sportcsarnok should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Felsőzsolca Városi Sportcsarnok.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

 Onel 5969  TT me 22:12, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Tokaj FC for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tokaj FC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tokaj FC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KylieTastic (talk) 13:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello, I'm Woodroar. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person   on Trey Spruance, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Woodroar (talk) 15:54, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Trey Spruance. Thank you. Woodroar (talk) 00:05, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you think you're doing at Trey Spruance, but please stop. Deliberately adding incorrect information to that article is considered vandalism and is a violation of our policies on articles about living persons, even if you revert your edits. If you continue editing like this, you will likely be blocked from editing. Woodroar (talk) 23:34, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Trey Spruance. Woodroar (talk) 23:33, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Bölcskei SE for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bölcskei SE is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bölcskei SE until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KylieTastic (talk) 18:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Koroncó KSSZE for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Koroncó KSSZE is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Koroncó KSSZE until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KylieTastic (talk) 18:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Dinamo Torpedo KSE for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dinamo Torpedo KSE is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dinamo Torpedo KSE until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KylieTastic (talk) 18:23, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Gödi SE for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gödi SE is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Gödi SE until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KylieTastic (talk) 18:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Final warning about BLPs
This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did  at Trey Spruance, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Woodroar (talk) 16:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at York City F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. JMHamo (talk) 08:15, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Amortias (T)(C) 17:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Elektromos pálya


The article Elektromos pálya has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * nothing found on a search and it is unlikely that a 1000 seat stand would be notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Domdeparis (talk) 15:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén megye I. moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén megye I., does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 10:34, 6 August 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén megye I. concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén megye I., a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén megye I.


Hello, Ivankola. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Borsod-Abaúj-Zemplén megye I.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)