User talk:Ivar1988

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daði Freyr Arnarsson (footballer) has been accepted
 Daði Freyr Arnarsson (footballer), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 20:49, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Da%C3%B0i_Freyr_Arnarsson_(footballer) help desk] .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Proposed deletion of Daði Freyr Arnarsson (footballer)


The article Daði Freyr Arnarsson (footballer) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:41, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Daði Freyr Arnarsson (footballer) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daði Freyr Arnarsson (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Daði Freyr Arnarsson (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:17, 17 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Daði Freyr Arnarsson


A tag has been placed on Daði Freyr Arnarsson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Snaevar (talk) 23:35, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

April 2017
Hello, I'm Sir Sputnik. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daði Freyr Arnarsson (footballer) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''As the notice at the top of all closed deletion discussions says: Please do not modify such pages. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this type of discussion page.'' Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:56, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Also using multiple accounts for disruptive edits is not a good idea will likely get you blocked. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:57, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Re: Daði Freyr Arnarsson
Let me get a few little things out of the way first before getting into the meat of this post. Please sign you talk page comments by typing four tildes (~) after them. This displays you username and a timestamp making it easier to keep track of who said what and when. Second let me explain disambiguation hatnotes. The reason titles of some articles include a profession in brackets following the person's name is to distinguish articles on people who happen to have the same name. (E.g. Winston Churchill and Winston Churchill (novelist).) In the case of Arnarsson this is not necessary.

All that being said, let me stress this again. Arnarsson does not meet the relevant notability guidelines at present. If you recreate the article, it will only be deleted again. For a footballer to have an article on Wikipedia, they must WP:NFOOTBALL, which is to say they must have played in one of the fully professional leagues listed here or for their country's senior national team. Arnarsson has done neither. Now if he's as good as you seem to think he is, one of these things will happen sooner or later and the article may be recreated then, but no sooner.

Finally, I should also mention that the way article is written has had no bearing the deletion of this article. You've done good work here, which makes all the more unfortunate that you've put so much effort into an article that does not meet the criteria for inclusion. I hope that clears things up. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:22, 11 April 2017 (UTC)