User talk:Ivarstrelow

January 2016
Hello, I'm ScrapIronIV. Your recent edit to the page Return of the Jedi appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Scr ★ pIron IV 15:19, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Star Wars: The Force Awakens. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.  Scr ★ pIron IV 15:20, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, you may be blocked from editing.  Scr ★ pIron IV 15:21, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Star Wars (film).  Scr ★ pIron IV 15:22, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.  Scr ★ pIron IV 15:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  Scr ★ pIron IV 15:34, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:.  Acroterion   (talk)   16:04, 16 January 2016 (UTC)