User talk:Iwanafish

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Arbitration/Requests/Case and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. As threaded discussion is not permitted on most arbitration pages, please ensure that you make all comments in your own section only. Additionally, the guide to arbitration and the Arbitration Committee's procedures may be of use.

Thanks, This is the only warning you will receive. Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. Although vandalizing articles on occasions that are days or weeks apart from each other sometimes prevents editors from being blocked, your continued vandalism constitutes a long term pattern of abuse. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Your Creation of John Carpenter Town Clerk of London
Hi, The Article you just wrote, John Carpenter Town Clerk of London, has been tagged for Speedy Deletion, because under CSD policy, section A3, it is simply a rephrasing of the title, and is a candidate for speedy deletion. If you wish to contest this place on the article, and the reason on the talk page. Thanks!

Stub notice
Your removal of the stub notice on your new article is outside of Wikipedia policy. It is standard procedure for short articles to be so tagged. If you want the tag removed, please expand the article. I am a Wikipedia administrator, and can assure you that I am not simply being difficult. Regards, --Fire Star 火星 01:29, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Just a quote note
Thanks for the creation and information on the Gido Shushin article. I was just recently, over the past few days, doing an internet search for him and barely came up with anything. Whatever you can offer is greatly appreciated. Sayvandelay 10:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

your creation of the Gao Lian (dramatist) article
would you mind formatting it properly? thanks Chensiyuan 14:18, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Julie-and-Bruce.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Julie-and-Bruce.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 07:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Yiting 1.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Yiting 1.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 04:17, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Yiting 5.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Yiting 5.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 05:10, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Juliet-and-husband-China-2006.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Juliet-and-husband-China-2006.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:45, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Song-period-green-Duan-inkstone.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Song-period-green-Duan-inkstone.jpg, has been listed at. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:06, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Please remember to sign your posts on talk pages
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 09:04, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Korean pottery vs Korean ceramics
Brit?? That's a laugh, although most of my great, great, great (etc....) grandparents came from Britain. No, I'm an American. I'm almost a Mayflower descendant - one of my ancestors was on the third expedition to New England. I live in the American West and spend a great deal of my time working with clay -- both as a teacher and as a producer of functional clay works. Yes -- I'm a potter and an archaeologist too! I've always got my hands in some kind of mud.

The differences we've long been discussing on this page are, from my perspective, based on a language preference in Asian cultures for "ceramics" and the western clay communities preference for "pottery." Korean contributors (see top of the talk page on the article) seemed to believe that "pottery" was a low-class term and denigrated the "art" ceramics of their country. Only tiles and industrial products were "pottery." Both of these communities appear to define the two words differently. But we aren't alone. When it comes to definitions, some contributors to other clay related articles in Wikipedia insist that vessels -- of whatever sort, from whatever culture -- are pottery, and non-vessels are ceramic items (see the talk page on Pottery). When people from art galleries and art academia show up, we often get a third perception. And historians and archaeologists may have a fourth viewpoint. And then the ceramic scientists chip in.

If you look around, you can see that the debate is broader than just this article, and that Wikipedia titles in this area are very inconsistent (see Chinese ceramics). I have a strong personal preference for pottery as the generic term, and use it that way in my writing. But I have an even stronger wish to come to some kind of consensus, some standards for clay related articles. You appear to be coming at this article from a different perspective, dealing with the history or art culture of Asia. But I suspect you can see the value to the Wikipedia reader of consistent terms for related topics. Would you be interested in working at common definitions of these terms? For many articles?

I won't move the article again, just yet. But I do wish you hadn't moved it until consensus was reached. Community involvement in decisions and consensus are considered among the highest of the Wiki-community virtues, and consensus is a Wiki policy. WBardwin 07:11, 3 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your note. I have moved it to my User Discussion page, like this one.  I certainly have great respect for Asian pottery traditions, and do think we should honor source definitions and compromise whenever possible.  But internal consistency would be of great value to the English speaking/reading public for whom we are writing the encyclopedia.  As of now, there is little consistency in vocabularly on the art and clay related articles.


 * English has great flexibility in vocabulary and usage, but that strength does lead to problems in translation from other cultures. The three (just three, initially, I hope) terms we are discussing come to modern English from three different sources.  "Ceramic" comes from the Greek κέράμους "of clay, earthen" and κέράμος "things of clay".  "Pot" and "pottery" come from the Germanic branch of the Indo-European language tree, in Old English pott and pottere simply meant "pots".  And "porcelain" comes from a later language, Italian, porcellana "a type of shell" which I assume was adopted for the color and translucency of the final product.  When I'm writing about pottery, I draw from my training in archaeology and art history as well as the practical experience I have as a potter.  My working definitions are as follows:
 * Ceramic: composed of or relating to clay.
 * Pottery: an object formed of prepared clay and minerals, and chemically processed by controlled heat.
 * Porcelain: a category of clay and clay products, a clay body chemically compounded to produce a finished white, translucent ware.


 * But, believe me, these definitions are not common to all English speakers. For example, during my lifetime, the word "ceramic" has taken on many shades of meaning.  The academic community (fond of words of Greek and Latin origin) has given ceramics a somewhat exalted class oriented place.  Sculpture, art, and objects made of clay are labeled "ceramic" if they are fine, beautiful, used by the elite, or considered to have great value; but are "clay figurines" or "pots" if they were used by common people or had more practical use.  This carries over to modern art galleries, who like to show "ceramic artists" rather than "potters".  However, in the basement of the archaeology building, all of these objects end up beling called "pots" or "potshards".  In contrast, in the western US, a craft movement arose in the last fifty years that focused on low fired figurines made from slip clay (some a low fire porcelain) formed in molds .  People could take the "green" figures, sand them, paint them with low fired glazes, and have them fired to produce a keepsake (generally not a work of art).  This movement came to be known as "ceramics" and shops and classes emerged teaching "ceramic" processes and firing methods.  My local clay supplier does about half their clay business with these kind of shops.  Although this is a reasonable use for clay, and has been throughout the ages, the use of the term "ceramics" has become even more muddied.  When people call my pottery studio to inquire about "ceramics", I have to question them about what they are looking for lest they show up at my door wanting to paint figurines rather than buy mugs, bowls, vases or my more art oriented work.


 * So, could you go into detail about the origins of the terms (Korean, Japanese, or Chinese?) that you are translating from? What do they really mean in modern usage?  From my definitions above, you can see that I would consider Korean pottery and porcelain redundant as porcelain ware is also a type of pottery.  And an article on Korean ceramics should include all Korean material made from clay - maybe even including ceramic computer components.  :-) A section on appropriate Korean vocabulary in the article itself could solve some of these problems, and be interesting too.  Thanks for responding.  WBardwin 00:55, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Interesting. The western term "pottery", particularly with modern ware, has no implication of firing temperature. Pottery has been produced throughout history at ever increasing temperatures.  In general, early pottery around the world was produced from residual, native clays which were rich in minerals and salts.  This pollution of the clay lowered the firing temperature, so that these clays matured at fairly low temperatures and were quite brittle.  Western archaeologists and potters call this type of clay "earthenware", i.e. I assume,  your "pottery."  Some modern ware is still produced from this clay at low temperatures - for example flower pots/planters often exported from Mexico (usually labeled terra-cotta) and tourist and art oriented ware by native peoples in the American Southwest and Mexico.  Higher fired ware (the equivalent of your "hard" ware or "porcelain") is usually distinguished in Europe/America between ""stoneware" " and "porcelain," based on the amount of mineral content still in the clay.  As iron is the primary mineral which can be present but still allow a high firing temperature, stoneware clays have a measurable iron content while porcelains or china clays (natural and commercially formulated) have almost none.


 * So, on a personal note, I produce in high fired ware, primarily in stoneware, although my clay closet does contain a supply of my favorite brilliantly white porcelain. So -- despite the color of the finished ware, would all my "pottery" be defined as "porcelain" in Asian terminology?  If so, I can begin to see why Asian contributors to Wiki would attach a low fired or cheap label to the use of "pottery."  This correspondence is helpful, if long.  Again, this type of info/comparison of terms would be useful in an article, even if we don't place it in the Korean "pottery" article.  WBardwin 06:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:IMG_0096_night.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:IMG_0096_night.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 19:51, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:IMG_0197_pair.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:IMG_0197_pair.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 19:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:IMG_0237_long_.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:IMG_0237_long_.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 19:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Yi._Flw..JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Yi._Flw..JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 19:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Juliet_1.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Juliet_1.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 19:56, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Images
Hi there! I've noticed that you've uploaded some images to Wikipedia over the last few months and tagged them using the PD-self tag. I'd like to ask you a couple of questions/make a couple of comments about these images if I may: I apologise if you are already familiar with this information - but also feel free to ask any questions you may still have about what I've written. Madmedea 19:36, 28 June 2007 (UTC)
 * For some of the images in the image summary you've include the words "fair use". As you may or may not know this phrase has a specific meaning in copyright law (see Fair use) and on Wikipedia (see Non-free content) which contradicts the meaning of PD-self license tag that you have used. Have you released these images into the public domain? Or did you mean to restrict their use? If you did mean to restrict their use you should change the copyright tag to a more suitable one - for a selection see WP:TAG.
 * To be able to release an image into the public domain using the PD-self tag you must be the copyright holder and be willing to release all rights to the image. If this is not the case for all the images you have uploaded and tagged using this tag - the tag needs to be changed.
 * If at all possible uploaded images should include a full image description. A template exists to help uploaders provide this - see Information. It would be really good if you could add this information to the images you've uploaded.
 * Finally....it would be better if images released into the public domain were uploaded directly on to the Wikimedia Commons as Wikipedia is not an image repository and should only really host images that have licenses that are not compatible with the Commons which only accepts freely licensed images.

Image reply
I am　the copyright holder and release all rights.--Iwanafish 23:47, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree image
I have listed the file Image:IMG 0182 Wu.JPG at possibly unfree images (and it will probably be deleted), because you make mutually incompatible statements about its copyright status (fair use and public domain). If you are the copyright holder, some evidence that this is the case would be helpful. - Mike Rosoft 18:11, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Update: you seem to be mass-uploading images from some website; please stop doing that, immediately. Should you continue uploading images with missing or incorrect information on its source or copyright status, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Also, unless you clarify the copyright status of the images you have uploaded within a week, I will nominate all of them for deletion. - Mike Rosoft 18:17, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Question for Mike
I must be doing something completely wrong. The photo in question is one I myself took. When I uploaded it on Wiki I typed in "fair use" and selected the "public domain" notice. This I thought was the correct process. I had thought that by doing this I had relinquished my rights to the photo. That is what I intended. Please inform. --Iwanafish 01:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Fair use means something completely different from what you seem to believe; it's a situation when the law permits you to use a work, whose copyright is held by somebody else, without the copyright holder's permission. An image cannot be both in public domain and used under fair use provisions. (See fair use, as well as Wikipedia policies and guidelines on fair use material.) I am sorry if I have been too harsh on you and falsely suspected you. You know, Wikipedia takes copyright issues very seriously. So, do you confirm that you have taken all the photos you have uploaded yourself (we have had a rather infamous user plagiarizing material to Wikipedia, claiming to have written it himself), and that you agree to release it into public domain (i.e. with no restrictions on its use and re-use, unless mandated by law)? If so, then I will take your word for it and won't pressure you further. Regards, Mike Rosoft 09:23, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

reply
"A few Chinese characters in an article are certainly helpful. However too many creates an ugliness of empty boxes for ordinary English readers. --Iwanafish 05:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)"

This is a China-related articles, a few Chinese characters are definitely needed, and pinyin is always prefered. For better consistency, uniform templates are required. You don't own the article, I hope you get that, unreasonable removal is not allowed and either is cap size font. The same goes with your silent reverting with the inappropriate edit summary. Don't complain too much, it will not do you any good, save it for your self flatter photo. Gallery box is good, because the article you wrote is not too long, other than the arsy-varsy make-up poems, it not the matter of aesthetics but allow readers much easier to read. Eiorgiomugini 09:55, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Celadon pictures
Hi, my name's Eric, otherwise known as Pericles of Athens on English Wikipedia. I love the Longquan celadon ware images that you uploaded to wikipedia, and I am using the two Song Dynasty items in two of my articles I've created, Economy of the Song Dynasty and Society of the Song Dynasty. Although you have them dated to the Song period, I was curious if you knew the exact century (approximately) each item was made, since the Song era of China stretched from the 10th to 13th centuries. If you can remember, that would be very helpful.-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 01:23, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

Dating
I dated the objects. One could argue that the vase was made a bit later, however the detail in the handles asks for 13th century. The warmer is very early Southern Song. --Iwanafish 15:49, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time to date those.-- Pericles of Athens  Talk 01:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Ouyang Xiu
This article is currently a GA candidate, but there is information from sources you entered that needs to be properly referenced. See the GA review section of the talk page for details. I don't have those works, so could you please do it. Furthermore, could you also please use the complete template for referencing those works. Thanks. ludahai 魯大海 03:56, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

Follow up in June 2009 - Iwanafish regarding the B-rated article Ouyang Xiu and the use of a questionable "source" material you have repeatedly inserted. The following is provided so you can correct the issues noted on the article discussion page. Your repeated reinsertion of the questionable material, without discussion other than attacking the messenger, is inappropiate. Warning templates referring to original research or unverified claims are used to encourage wiki editors to correct issues. Your overt and negative responses stress a lack of Civility to Wikipedia policies has been noted and are being documented. Your implied legal "threat" is covered in No legal threats and attacking the messenger is covered under No personal attacks the combined comments border on Harassment.

Citing sources and avoiding original research are inextricably linked. To demonstrate that you are not presenting original research, you must cite reliable sources that are directly related to the topic of the article, and that directly support the information as it is presented.

"No original research" is one of three core content policies. The others are neutral point of view and verifiability. Jointly, these policies determine the type and quality of material that is acceptable in articles. Because they complement each other, they should not be interpreted in isolation from one another, and editors should familiarize themselves with all three.

Enfermero (talk) 08:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Celadon
Hi! If you have time, could you be bothered to improve the celadon article, because it suffers from some grammatical errors and short/brief contents. I know you have already contributed much to it, but it could have potentials though.

BTW, Do you also have other celadon or porcelain images (especially Ming vase would be great, because for such well-known items, I can't believe that it would be hard to find images of it around) that could be uploaded to Wikipedia, that would be fanastic. Thanks!--Balthazarduju (talk) 22:45, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

A Ming Vase-celadon photo should show quality of glaze. Historical changes in celadon were in the etched designs and colors. They attempted a popular appeal with decorative devices. Underglaze blue was putting them out of business. Ming celadon can somestimes be awful, but at other times interesting with the 14-15th century productions still admired at middle eastern destinations. In other words a photo of one of those.--Iwanafish (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Recent edits to the I Ching article
Iwanafish: Please stop inserting the current version of the "Westernization of the I Ching" paragraph into the article. Editorial decisions about an article are made on the talk page, by consensus. Concerns have been raised about the material in question, and, in its present form, the paragraph cannot stand. It is unsourced, and is from a particular point of view (that is, it is not neutral). If you wish to participate in the discussion on the talk page, that would be welcome. I believe that the paragraph could be re-written, sources found and many of the ideas included. However, as I have indicated in an edit summary, if you continue to insert that text into the article in its present form, it will be treated as vandalism and you could be blocked from editing. Sunray (talk) 07:03, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Nantoyōsō Collection
Hello, Iwanafish. I saw your pictures taken in Nantoyōsō Collection. I would like to know more about Nantoyōsō collection, but cannot find information about the collection in Japanse documents. Please tell me the Chinese character spelling of Nantoyōsō Collection, or in which museum the collections are. Thank you.--Mochi (talk) 06:33, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello, my name is Zixiao, I want to follow up on this question as well. Could you please add a small detail about the Nantoyoso collection? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BrownieWong (talk • contribs) 20:12, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

January, 2008
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sunray (talk) 03:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Iwanafish, I posted this on the WP:AN/I page:


 * Having been a victim of more than one setup in my history on wikipedia, and having an interest and expertise in Chinese, this post caught my eye. When I investigated I found Iwanafish was not alone in wanting some of his edits included, despite Sunray's portrait. Indeed Iwanafish sourced one of his edits to p131 of Needham's classic. Sunray's rejection of Needham is most unwarranted. Needham's is one of the modern classics of world and China related scholarship. If his views on Chinese mysticism are not relevant then it is a very sad day for wikipedia. Having said that, I do not condone Iwanafish's style - though I point out that Sunray equally shares a tendency for reversion, and further, a tendency for ownership of the page in question. I recommend guidance for Iwanafish and Sunray, not the penalty Sunray seeks. Mccready (talk) 15:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Sunray does not appear to be an administrator, so his posting of this message would appear unwarranted and a heavy handed tactic in an edit war. Nonetheless, you need to provide reliable sources for all your edits, not just the Needham quote. Mccready (talk) 15:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The only difference between administrators and other editors is tools. As long as I follow policy, there is no reason why I shouldn't warn someone who is violating policy. This is no edit war. Please refer to the talk page if you doubt this. Sunray (talk) 11:01, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

Which tag did you put on ceramic related images, fair use or PD-self?
Hello, Iwanafish. Thank you for sharing good images of yours to English Wikipedia, but I little confuse your image rationale. You wrote "fair use" in summaries, but put "PD-self" tag. If you want to claim that the images are all copyrighted, you should put either fair use template and provide fair use rationale or I you distribute them under PD (best for Wikipedians..), you need to clarify the summary. --Appletrees (talk) 01:21, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

And someone proposes to merge articles regarding Dehua porcelain, some of which you created, so please participate in discussion at Talk:Blanc-de-Chine. Thanks--Appletrees (talk)

William Elliot Griffis
Your minor edit to William Elliot Griffis is unimpeachable, of course; but it caused me to wonder. As it happens, this word choice has remained unnoticed for more than a decade. ''' Revision as of 13:15, 15 October 2005 (edit) (undo) User:Dedden (Talk | contribs) Newer edit → ''' I checked the edit history in hopes that I might ask the original writer why the term "westernizing" was used rather than "modernizing," but it seems unlikely that the original Dutch Dedden contributor will recall. If you know, perhaps you wouldn't mind explaining your reasoning? Although I can point to no specific citation, I have the impression that Griffis himself would have understood his career in Japan as "Westernizing" -- and perhaps we can guess that others like Sir Rutherford Alcock and Sir Harry Parkes might have thought this term was sufficiently precise.

I myself prefer your word choice. I think "modernizing" is better, but I plan to remain on the look-out for a citation which would support a revert-edit to the use of "Westernizing" in this article and elsewhere. Do you see my point? "Modernizing" ≠ "Westernizing"? --Tenmei (talk) 14:08, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:IMG_0094_Inkstone.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:IMG_0094_Inkstone.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Jordan 1972 (talk) 00:37, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:IMG_0255_Kang_.JPG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:IMG_0255_Kang_.JPG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Jordan 1972 (talk) 15:30, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

 Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 01:20, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

IMG 0224 tide.JPG
I moved your image to the Commons at File:Low tide on Whidbey Island.JPG, but I was interested in which beach it was taken at. Also, the description read "fair use"--could you clarify that?

--Hotshot977 (talk) 21:44, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

April 2009
Iwanafish This is a warning for your disruptive edits. Caution: do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you have done with Rehoboth Carpenter family.

Please use the article discussion page of Rehoboth Carpenter family to post your arguements for or against. Repeatedly removing another's edit without discussion or reason is disruptive.

Please communicate & discuss, please do not try to create an edit war. Several people have tried (by sending email to your various emails for some time) to communicate with you to help establish a neutral point of view regarding this and other articles.

I am asking a few Wiki editors to monitor Rehoboth Carpenter family.

John R. Carpenter La Mesa, CA Jrcrin001 (talk) 23:34, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

I reverted your last two edits of Rehoboth Carpenter family back to the last version, it appears that the version you had changed it to was an older version from 2006 or 2007. I'm guessing this was probably accidental. riffic (talk) 07:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * or maybe not. Please bring your concerns to the talk page first, before making drastic changes to an article. Thanks riffic (talk) 07:33, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * again, you reverted this article, but the reason is unclear. Please bring your concerns to the talk page, thanks riffic (talk) 03:35, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * okay, another unclear, unexplained revert. Can you just give a quick heads up to the article's talk page? thanks riffic (talk) 01:18, 11 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Hi, This has now come up at WP:EAR. You need to explain what you're doing and join the discussion on the article's talk page, please, if you're going to be active at that page. Any other unexplained and/or undiscussed edits might be seen as vandalism or edit warring, and you're experienced enough an editor to know that's a bad thing. Thanks in advance, --AndrewHowse (talk) 15:18, 16 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Let me add my voice here too. This is clearly a content dispute and your failure to engage in discussion with other editors is troubling and potentially disruptive. Please attempt to reach consensus on the article's talk page. Thank you. – ukexpat (talk) 12:43, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
Iwanafish aka 160.244.140.202 This is a warning for your continuing disruptive edits. Caution: do not violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you have done with Rehoboth Carpenter family and now Culham.

Please use the article discussion page of Rehoboth Carpenter family and Culham to post your arguements for or against. Repeatedly removing another's edit without discussion or reason is disruptive and wrong.

Please communicate & discuss, please do not start another edit war. Several people have tried (by sending email to your various emails for some time) to communicate with you to help establish a neutral point of view regarding this and other articles.

John R. Carpenter Jrcrin001 (talk) 17:32, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Vandalisim
Iwanafish aka 160.244.140.202 This is a warning for your continuing disruptive edits are now vadalisim. Your deliberate non-communication, compromise and smearing is now considered vadalisim and will be reported and documented as such. John R. Carpenter Jrcrin001 (talk) 00:13, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Vandalisim warning again
Iwanafish aka 160.244.140.202 This is a warning for your continuing disruptive edits and deliberate vandalisim on Rehoboth Carpenter family,Culham and now John Carpenter (bishop).

You refuse to discuss, talk or converse. Your actions indicate you are deliberately causing harm to these articles for no apparent reason. It is childish, unprofessional and wrong. You need to stop. Maybe it is time to contact your employer in Japan ...

John R. Carpenter Jrcrin001 (talk) 23:08, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

7 May 2009
Warning!

To Iwanafish, alias 125.199.58.121 and 160.244.140.202, in response to your most recent reinsertion, this date, of a false assertion:

Your repeated insertion of the baseless claim (see Talk:Culham, Disputes section) that the Carpenters of Shalbourne, Weymouth, and Rehoboth originated in Culham violates Wikipedia standards pertaining to factual accuracy, neutrality, original research, and unverified claims. And your refusal to discuss these and similar violations in other Wikipedia articles ("Rehoboth Carpenter family" in particular) is at odds with Wikipedia's cooperative ethos.

If you persist, action will be taken against you. GeneZub (talk) 20:04, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

John Carpenter (bishop)
Hi Iwanafish. I have reverted your change on this page because you did not explain what the nature of the misinformation was. Thank you. Toirdhealbach (talk) 08:13, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

15 May 2009 - More than 3 warnings of continued vandal behavior
'''Warning! Vandal Behavior continues after more than 3 warnings!!!''' Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rehoboth Carpenter family, you will be blocked from editing. To Iwanafish, alias 125.199.58.121 and 160.244.140.202 Regarding Rehoboth Carpenter family - We have surveyed, we have compromised, we have repeatedly asked you - user Iwanafish to communicate. You refuse and only make snide comments and reversions to non-wiki versions. You appear to be deliberately sabatoging wikipedia with your vandal type behavior. You need to stop, communicate and participate.

You - User Iwanafish continues to disrupt and vandalize Rehoboth Carpenter family and it has spread to other pages. John Carpenter (bishop) John Carpenter, town clerk of London Jrcrin001 (talk) 06:31, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but several of your recent edits removed maintenance templates from. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Enfermero (talk) 08:16, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Regarding the Rehoboth Carpenter family article
I found the article Rehoboth Carpenter family by looking through changes to Uncategorized pages, and it seems like you have some issues with the article. What do you object to regarding that article? I think it would be helpful if you could explain what you think is wrong with the article on the article talk page. Thank you. --Pixelface (talk) 01:19, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Iwanafish, I noticed that you created the Rehoboth Carpenter family article in October 2006. What are the problems you currently have with that article? --Pixelface (talk) 23:20, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

18 May 2009 - Warning2 regarding vandal behavior
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Rehoboth Carpenter Family. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. John Carpenter, town clerk of London Your deliberate removal of references, pictures, and wiki format from these articles violates Wikipedia policies. Jrcrin001 (talk) 06:10, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rehoboth Carpenter Family, you will be blocked from editing. To Iwanafish, alias 125.199.58.121 and 160.244.140.202 Your 4 unexplained reversions to a non-standard format with references removed is unwarranted for that article and done within 3 hours. This does not include your vandal behavior to John Carpenter (bishop), John Carpenter, town clerk of London, and Culham within the same time period even after the warning given just above. Jrcrin001 (talk) 07:02, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --> See: Rehoboth Carpenter family and at John Carpenter (bishop), John Carpenter, town clerk of London, and Culham. Jrcrin001 (talk) 07:51, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

21 May 2009 - Another warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --> See: Rehoboth Carpenter family and at John Carpenter (bishop), John Carpenter, town clerk of London, and Culham.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rehoboth Carpenter Family, you will be blocked from editing.
 * To Iwanafish. Your documented aliases now include 125.199.58.121, 160.244.140.202, and 220.102.13.244.
 * Since 1 April 2009 your primary focus (including by your known aliases) has been to disrupt and vandalize the Wikipedia format and system in a series of articles involving Carpenters.
 * See: Rehoboth Carpenter family, John Carpenter (bishop), John Carpenter, town clerk of London, and Culham articles.
 * Iwanafish's negative contributions are well documented at: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=100&target=Iwanafish
 * See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/220.102.13.244
 * See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/125.199.58.121
 * See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/160.244.140.202
 * Jrcrin001 (talk) 05:50, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Edit warring at Rehoboth Carpenter Family
Hello Iwanafish. A complaint about your edits has been filed at WT:AN3. My study of the history suggests that this complaint is justified. You repeatedly revert this article to a version that is supported *only by you*. Your unwillingness to participate on Talk has been extensively discussed by a variety of editors at Talk:Rehoboth Carpenter Family. I strongly recommend that you revert your most recent change at Rehoboth Carpenter Family to the version that was there before. If you don't do so, and if you continue to edit Wikipedia without responding to this complaint, you may be blocked for edit warring. EdJohnston (talk) 13:56, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

26 May 2009
Kungtzu now appears as alias of Iwanafish based on identical behavior.


 * To Iwanafish. Your documented aliases now include 125.199.58.121, 160.244.140.202, and 220.102.13.244.
 * Since 1 April 2009 your primary focus (including by your known aliases) has been to disrupt and vandalize the Wikipedia format and system in a series of articles involving Carpenters.
 * See: Rehoboth Carpenter family, John Carpenter (bishop), John Carpenter, town clerk of London, and Culham articles.
 * Iwanafish's negative contributions are well documented at: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=100&target=Iwanafish
 * See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/220.102.13.244
 * See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/125.199.58.121
 * See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/160.244.140.20
 * Compare to:Kungtzu http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kungtzu

To Iwanafish multiple user accounts to disrupt or vandal Wikipedia are a violation of Wikipedia policy and result in your account and aliases being listed as Vandalism-only account. The following policy references should be reviewed by you.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Username_policy#Using_multiple_accounts It is recommended that contributors do not use multiple accounts without good reason, because the misuse of multiple accounts is a major problem on Wikipedia. Using multiple accounts to give the appearance of popularity to an idea, to avoid scrutiny, or to avoid a block or ban on another account are considered major abuses and are not tolerated on Wikipedia.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Username_policy#Dealing_with_inappropriate_usernames Administrators may issue username blocks under the following circumstances: Disruptive usernames that have clearly been created only to cause trouble should also be blocked indefinitely, but in such cases it is usually also desirable to block anonymous editing and prevent further accounts being created (enable autoblocks, and enable "prevent account creation"). Such disruptive usernames may contain harassment or personal attacks, or be easily identifiable as a previously banned user or vandal. Any block issued as a result of a user's behavior may take their username into account, if it is part of the problem. Such a block may be extended to an indefinite block in order to disallow the username. Behavioural blocks are usually issued for disruption, incivility or personal attacks. Jrcrin001 (talk) 16:03, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. Long term edit warring on articles about people surnamed Carpenter. For example, at Rehoboth Carpenter Family. See the warning I left above, and the original complaint at WT:AN3. From the further complaints by other users above, I perceive that you have abused multiple accounts. If you ever hope to return to good standing on Wikipedia, the use of socks has to stop. EdJohnston (talk) 16:17, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Warning regarding removal of maintenance templates
Iwanafish Please stop. Your repeated edits removing maintenance templates after previous cautions requires a warning from. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of those templates has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Enfermero (talk) 18:18, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
 * You were cautioned about removing warning or maintenance templates and the behavior continues with: Hu Zhiyu, Xu Wei,  Qian Qianyi.
 * Your behavior of removing warning or maintenance templates has continued without proper resolution or discussion on the discussion or talk page of: Yuan Zhongdao, Dijing Jingwulue, Xu Zaisi, Ling Mengchu, He Chaozong, Lu Zhi (poet), Song Xu, Chinese Inkstone, Gidō Shūshin, Yuan Hongdao,  Wang Heqing, Yao Shouzhong, Zhu Hong, Shiwan Ware, Chinese Tongzhi ceramics.
 * Your belittling type comments without addressing the issues, raises the concern of Civility. Enfermero (talk) 08:26, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Warning regarding personal attacks and legal threats
This a follow up from June 9, 2009 in the section of Ouyang Xiu above. See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Iwanafish#Ouyang_Xiu

Iwanafish Please stop. Your repeated comments of not addressing the issues are personal attacks and implying legal action directly or indirectly is a violation of simple civility and Wikipedia policies. Civility and discussion of related article issues is important on Wikipedia. If you continue such behavior, you could be blocked from editing on Wikipedia.

Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Please see: No personal attacks - Any  "Racial, sexual, homophobic, ageist, religious, political, ethnic, or other epithets (such as against people with disabilities) directed against another contributor"  should never be tolerated and needs to be addressed immediately. Please see also: No legal threats.

This is because of your comments at: Enfermero (talk) 22:53, 21 June 2009 (UTC)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:John_Carpenter,_town_clerk_of_London#VANDALISM.3F.3F.3F.3F.3F.3F.3F.3F.3F.3F.3F.3F.3F
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ouyang_Xiu#Efermero_assertion
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Juliet_Winters_Carpenter
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Ludahai#BEWARE_ENFERMERO

August 2009
Iwanafish your use of Daikusama (talk) as a Sockpuppet or an alternative account was used for fraudulent, disruptive, or otherwise deceptive purposes that violate or circumvent the enforcement of Wikipedia policies. WP policy states that alternate accounts are explicitly forbidden: using them to avoid scrutiny, misleading others by making disruptive edits with one account and normal edits with another, distorting consensus or artificially stirring up controversy, or otherwise circumventing Wikipedia policies. The misuse of an alternative account has resulted in Daikusama (talk) being blocked from editing indefinitely. If you ever hope to return to good standing on Wikipedia, the use of socks has to stop. Enfermero (talk) 23:43, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:IMG Yuan Collected.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:IMG Yuan Collected.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:28, 5 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 20:28, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Enfermeroo - another sockpuppet of Iwanafish
Dear Mr. Carpenter,

Enfermeroo sockpuppet

Very funny! Your use of a variant user name to try to discredit me (and your earlier effort to promote me to administrator) is flattering. But you are fooling no one but yourself. Your use of the sockpuppet "Enfermeroo" matches your profile. Your ongoing misbehavior is wrong and inappropiate for Wikipedia. And yes, you will be reported again for sockpuppetry.


 * To Iwanafish. Your documented aliases now include 125.199.58.121, 160.244.140.202, and 220.102.13.244.
 * Since 1 April 2009 your primary focus (including by your known aliases) has been to disrupt and vandalize the Wikipedia format and system in a series of articles involving Carpenters.
 * See: Rehoboth Carpenter family, John Carpenter (bishop), John Carpenter, town clerk of London, and Culham articles.
 * Iwanafish's negative contributions are well documented at: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&limit=100&target=Iwanafish
 * See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/220.102.13.244
 * See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/125.199.58.121
 * See also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/160.244.140.20
 * Compare to:Kungtzu http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Kungtzu
 * Compare to:Daikusama http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Daikusama
 * Compare to:Enfermeroo http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Enfermeroo

Enfermero (talk) 18:06, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * You were cautioned about removing warning or maintenance templates and the behavior continues with: Qian Qianyi, Juliet Winters Carpenter and others.
 * Your behavior of removing warning or maintenance templates has continued without proper resolution or discussion on the discussion or talk page of: Yuan Zhongdao, Xu Zaisi, Ling Mengchu, Lu Zhi (poet), Song Xu, Yuan Hongdao, Wang Heqing, Yao Shouzhong, Zhu Hong, Chinese export porcelain among others.
 * You were warned repeatedly about the use of sockpuppets and the behavior continues under Enfermeroo. See above.

September 2009
Iwanafish your use of Enfermeroo (talk) as a Sockpuppet or an alternative account was used for fraudulent, disruptive, or otherwise deceptive purposes that violate or circumvent the enforcement of Wikipedia policies. WP policy states that alternate accounts are explicitly forbidden: using them to avoid scrutiny, misleading others by making disruptive edits with one account and normal edits with another, distorting consensus or artificially stirring up controversy, or otherwise circumventing Wikipedia policies. The misuse of an alternative account has resulted in Enfermeroo (talk) being blocked from editing indefinitely. If you ever hope to return to good standing on Wikipedia, the use of socks has to stop.
 * Please operate within Wikipedia guidelines. See links above or please ask.  Enfermero (talk) 01:54, 23 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Dai Hsi 2.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Dai Hsi 2.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:11, 23 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:11, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Inkstone.jpg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Inkstone.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:57, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

File:IMG 0153 Tenkei.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMG 0153 Tenkei.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 14:10, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

File:IMG 0183red.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMG 0183red.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 17:08, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:IMG 0183red.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMG 0183red.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 17:08, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:IMG Dehua BW.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMG Dehua BW.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 17:10, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Long Celedon Bowl 1.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Long Celedon Bowl 1.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 17:12, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:IMG 0221 Adm.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMG 0221 Adm.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 17:59, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:IMG 0223 clin.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMG 0223 clin.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 18:00, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:IMG 0227 lyn.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMG 0227 lyn.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 18:01, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:IMG 0521M.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IMG 0521M.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) 19:27, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File:SANY0067 With Ed.JPG missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:SANY0067 With Ed.JPG is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:18, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Image source problem with File:Chen 1.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:Chen 1.JPG.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:20, 8 November 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:20, 8 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Seidensticker.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Seidensticker.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:10, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:IMG 0252 fish.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:IMG 0252 fish.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 03:33, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:IMG 0250 Wen.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:IMG 0250 Wen.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 03:33, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:IMG 0277Korea.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:IMG 0277Korea.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 03:39, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:IMG 0275Sg.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:IMG 0275Sg.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 03:39, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:IMG 0464JL.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:IMG 0464JL.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 20:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

File source problem with File:IMG 04J28.JPG
Thank you for uploading File:IMG 04J28.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a [ list of your uploads]. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 20:27, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Traditional Woodblock - Painting of the Cups.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Traditional Woodblock - Painting of the Cups.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dianna (talk) 23:59, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

File:SANY0067 With Ed.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SANY0067 With Ed.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 20:01, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:A Chinese song dynasty celadon warmer ware.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:19, 6 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Anti-Catholic, Shen Que Text.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Bodhisattva Guanyin from Nantoyōsō Collection.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Cherry trees on Mount Ikoma.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:29, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Shiwan Ware figures.jpg
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Shiwan Ware figures.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. -- Тимофей ЛееСуда . 22:22, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Presentaion 1.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Presentaion 1.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Kelly hi! 11:55, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Tripod Box Cover.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Tripod Box Cover.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Dehua tripod.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dehua tripod.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:05, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Whidbey Island low tide.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Whidbey Island low tide.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Wuxi 1.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Wuxi 1.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:06, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Tiger Kiln 1.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Tiger Kiln 1.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Tiger Kiln 2.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Tiger Kiln 2.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Song Xu painting.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Song Xu painting.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:KU Yun.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:KU Yun.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Redo Wang.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Redo Wang.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:08, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kameyama porcelain (1800s).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kameyama porcelain (1800s).jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:08, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Guan Lady.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Guan Lady.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:08, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Kitsap County from Whidbey Island.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Kitsap County from Whidbey Island.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:09, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Nara 1.JPG


The file File:Nara 1.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned image, what is meant with 'fair use'?"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:09, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Longquan vases.JPG


The file File:Longquan vases.JPG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned image, what is meant with 'fair use'?"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 19:10, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Juliet Winters Carpenter.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Juliet Winters Carpenter.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 04:44, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Jingde era porcelain.jpg


The file File:Jingde era porcelain.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, redundant to File:Porcelain plate - Jingdezhen.jpg."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax &laquo;&brvbar;talk&brvbar;&raquo; 11:23, 24 December 2023 (UTC)