User talk:Iyo-farm


 * If an unblock request is made, please note that Iyo-farm removed the note I left here. There was consensus at ANI that Iyo-farm not be unblocked without a topic ban from animal rights and the Holocaust. Iyo-farm, if you decide to request an unblock, do not remove this note to the reviewing admin. --Floquenbeam (talk) 13:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Also note: I removed an unblock request posted by an IP editor here. If that was a joe job, then requiring Iyo-farm to sign in will protect their reputation. If that was actually Iyo-farm, then be aware if you repost such an obviously unactionable unblock request with your account, I will remove talk page access, as it will then be clear you plan to waste everyone's time. --Floquenbeam (talk) 21:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Capitalisation of organisation
BTW, part of this edit is wrong,. Mass-Observation should be capitalised as per the organization's name, & linked to its page. (Originally Mass-Observation, then Mass Observation). Thanks. --Iyo-farm (talk) 11:35, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Investigated, confirmed, and fixed. Thanks for your observation, but you could have edited this yourself if you had your editing privileges back. If you wish to continue to edit here, your next step is to appeal your block. Good luck.
 * P.S. I've taken the liberty of adding a section title above, in order to separate this discussion from the unrelated unblock review above. Mathglot (talk) 00:08, 12 October 2021 (UTC)

Unblock request
Like them or not, those are the facts.

You know, there's times when "the community" (which really just mean a handful of editors owning a page & a certain culture within the admins), needs to look at itself, its irrationality &, as stated, its disingenuousness. Tendencies that it especially does not like to have pointed out.

As with the correction above, or the edit to Sandra Hüller's page, they'd rather have incorrect, unfactual & misleading information - or none, or to lose an editor - than tolerate an editor who won't suck their dicks.

Or have to discuss the actual issues that brought about conflicts or bans in the first place.

Indeed, they'd rather invest their time playing Whac-A-Mole with editors who won't than actually start new pages, sort out old ones, or do real work.

It was in the first place, and remains, just WP:GAMING so, no, I'm not sucking dick to be allowed to work for free & am happy to waste your time & energy pointing out the irrationalities instead. Your decision. (Bearing in mind, all of this was all about just 45 well referenced & relevant words) --Iyo-farm (talk) 07:39, 12 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Talk page access removed. This has become a timesink: current behavior demonstrates no chance of a productive unblock request in the near future. Also, noting block evasion with IP edits. --Floquenbeam (talk) 15:25, 12 October 2021 (UTC)