User talk:Izmgh

RE: Image:Aerial 004.jpg
Before reverting my changes, you should have read what I posted under the "Licensing" section. This image is not in the public domain and it is not a work of the United States Federal Government. In the future, please use greater caution before making reversions. -JakeApple 20:53, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

What corrupt image???
WTF is ???

What do you mena by missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image. Image is definitely not corrupt and not without descroption. so, what the hell is problem with it.

BTW, it's used on 9 pages! --Ante Perkovic 20:54, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Foetry.com
Hi Izmgh - I added rationale for Foetry.com's article not being advertising. Please let me know if this sounds reasonable to you.Talk:Foetry.comProfJeFF 20:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)