User talk:Izueke chijioke

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drewmutt was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Izueke chijioke/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Izueke chijioke/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Izueke_chijioke/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Drewmutt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Izueke_chijioke/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drewmutt ( ^ᴥ^ ) talk  02:21, 24 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Paceloti for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paceloti is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Paceloti until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 (talk) 15:17, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Paceloti, you may be blocked from editing. Praxidicae (talk) 18:14, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Apologies & Welcome
Hello, I may have appeared to be a little harsh, I’m sorry about that. Okay let’s start with your final request at Praxidicae’s talk page, in which you asked me to remove an AFD template, I’m sorry but at this point it simply cannot be done. If an article is nominated for deletion, see WP:AFD, it has to run for at least seven days in which editors can !vote a delete or a keep. Now allow me explain why I nominated your article for deletion. This community isn’t a place like WP:LINKEDIN where you create a profile & promote yourself any how you see fit, no it isn’t like that here. On Wikipedia, we use WP:GNG to test how notable a subject of an article is, if they fail to satisfy WP:GNG we nominate them for deletion & even worse is when you create an article for yourself it is very much disallowed or rather discouraged. In your case you are not yet notable enough to have a stand alone article. When or if you do became notable someone else would write a page for you. Read WP:GNG thoroughly before going on to create another article in future as even the best of editors in this collaborative project struggle to comprehend WP:GNG. It isn’t also a function of being a new or an old editor as even administrators here have their articles sometimes end up in an AFD. This is basically a skeletal framework of how things are done here & not the entirety of who we are or what we do as it goes beyond what I just told you above as editing here is a lifelong learning process. Read WP:AUTO, WP:COI, The golden rule also, but first commit to memory the contents of general notability guidelines.Celestina007 (talk) 19:28, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Izueke chijioke, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you created or edited was Paceloti, which appears to be an article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is a common mistake made by new Wikipedians—as this is an encyclopedia, we wouldn't expect to have an article about every contributor. Your user page, however, is a great place to write about yourself, making sure to stay within user page guidelines. Just click your user name at the top of the screen when you are logged in, and edit it normally.

The page you created about yourself may well be deleted from the encyclopedia. If it is deleted and you wish to retrieve its contents, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page. If your contributions to an existing article about yourself are undone and you wish to add to it, please propose the changes on its talk page.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Celestina007 (talk) 19:59, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

It is a bad idea to write an article about yourself
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Paceloti. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:39, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Izueke chijioke/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Izueke chijioke/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Minorax (talk) 06:37, 4 May 2020 (UTC)