User talk:Izztek

Deleted page "Israel Wignall"
A page you created, or image you uploaded, Israel Wignall, has been [ deleted] in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets the one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:


 * Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content. An article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable notability guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content; it will be deleted again and may be protected from re-creation. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you – Gurch 18:43, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Evolution Edit
I read your edit and i just want to point out the errors: there hasn't been ANY logical proof to support the theory of mankind coming from evolution.

Theres plenty of proof that evolution exists, in fact theres FAR more then u could probably even imagine, creationism puts up evidence every so often, and it lasts for a while before being investigated by evolutionary scientists and then refuted. That is why you never hear of intermediate species any more, or bacterial flagellum, or the blood clotting mechanism. Evolutionary scientists proved wrong the creationists/IDists.

Scientists can't explain "matter coming from nothing" and the scientific principal of "something growing into something else".

Well the first one has nothing to do with evolution, thats the big bang theory, the second one creationists/IDists already support in part, but place a limit on either not changing species, or not changing kinds (which creat/IDists define a a similar group of species), though creat/IDists have no mechanism for this.

''Haha, too bad scientists are now finding C-14 in dinosaur bones, proving they were around the past 100,000 years, not 65 million years! =]''

Who did you hear this off? Carbon Dating doesnt go back further than 60,000 years, because C-14 decays in that time. Dont believe me? Check the Radiocarbon dating article ;) But back to the actual dating, elements with longer half-lifes are used for dinosaurs. If you are an evolutionist, OPEN YOUR EYES! There are SO many flaws in the theory, and it is starting to fall apart!

Please point them out if there really is, but im sure you will be corrected by someone more knowledgable. Besides lets say hypothetically you are right, there are other options other than evolution and creationism, so you still dont "win" or whatever...

Even though your evolutionist buddies might say, "Hey, new evidence!", they are getting that from someone else!

lmao, really? all the evidence needed can be found in scientific literature/media, infact thats where most evolutionists get their evidence from, we dont tell each other about "new evidence" lol, we reasearch it ourselves if we are genuinely interested

There isn't a SINGLE skeleton found that supports it

Supports what? Evolution? Every single fossil found supports evolution! they are just another piece in teh jigsaw of the history of our planet!

they have all been either early forms of man (like pygmies), or extinct species of apes.

pygmies arent earlier forms of man! and yes mans fossil record includes extinct apes, because well we ARE apes ourselves! sure we may be hairless, brainy and not swing from trees, but we are still primates.

If we can find tons of dinosaur bones everywhere, why can't we find a SINGLE skeleton for a missing link?

lmao, you havent studied this at all heres a picture showing 12 of these evolutionary "missing links" between the man/chimp split (5mya) and now.

There hasn't been ANYTHING that logically supports human evolution.

So have you researched this yourself? or are you just re-saying what preacher/friend told you?

'''Hope that helps... feel free to drop me a line on my talk page -- Nbound 00:23, 17 February 2007 (UTC)'''